1.1 Overview of Rural Markets in Developing Economies

The rural markets within developing economies stand as a major untapped market segment which contains intricate social cultural elements and vast growth potential. Most marketing approaches together with consumer behavior research have historically focused on urban and wealthy groups while ignoring the distinct requirements of rural populations along with low-income consumers [1]. The increasing focus on inclusive development has led to rural markets being seen as essential targets for both economic development and social programs [2]. The increasing focus on rural markets emerges from the realization that most developing nations consist of rural consumers who actively participate in consumption patterns which combine economic constraints with cultural traditions and innovative approaches. The markets face multiple limitations because of weak infrastructure and restricted educational opportunities and financial services and deficient information distribution systems which makes their analysis both vital and difficult [3].

1.2 Significance of Studying Rural Consumer Behavior

The knowledge of rural consumer behavior serves marketing managers together with policymakers to build context-sensitive and cost-effective strategies. The knowledge goes beyond buying decisions since it includes the way people see products and services along with their access points and usage patterns [4]. Rural consumers base their purchasing decisions on price and function yet they also consider cultural and psychological as well as social elements. The academic research demonstrates that rural consumers conduct themselves through fundamental cultural principles and communal relationships alongside informal social ties which differ from urban and developed market patterns [5]. Recognizing these behavioral patterns enables the creation of business models which serve local needs while promoting social equity. The inclusion of rural perspectives in marketing education enables students to build strategies that truly benefit marginalized groups [6].

1.3 Unique Challenges and Opportunities in Rural Consumer Markets

Rural consumer markets present a unique combination of challenges and opportunities. These markets face operational difficulties because of poor road infrastructure together with insufficient retail networks and restricted banking access. The lack of literacy together with minimal mass media exposure reduce the effectiveness of standard marketing approaches [7]. The obstacles that these markets face enable businesses to develop new approaches through micro-entrepreneurship and localized production and direct selling and socially embedded distribution networks. Research shows that low-income consumers depend on trust relationships and community decisions along with purchasing models that include informal credit and small-quantity options [8]. Local realities create a distinct chance for businesses to develop innovative products and services which generate social impact and economic value. Word-of-mouth marketing develops naturally in these markets because strong family and social networks help spread information [9].

1.4 Objectives and Scope of the Review

This review aims to establish extensive knowledge about consumer actions which are typical among low-income people in rural and subsistence markets of developing economies [10]. The research investigates the psychological and social and cultural elements affecting consumer behavior through systematic analysis to link standard marketing theories with rural consumer realities. The main goal of this study is twofold: it showcases existing challenges faced by this market segment and finds workable solutions for inclusive marketing approaches that focus on sustainability and community empowerment [11]. The review establishes its boundaries through an assessment of theoretical models along with empirical evidence and case-specific observations which provide essential guidance to academics and business strategists and policymakers. The review promotes a new perspective which shifts the perception of low-income consumers from passive recipients to active participants who influence market trends and generate innovation [12].

2.1 Definition and Characteristics of Rural Consumers

People living outside of urban areas who work in agricultural settings or run small businesses or engage in informal economic activities are known as rural consumers. The rural consumer profile shows multiple distinctions from urban residents because of the combined effects of their decreased financial means and restricted infrastructure and their particular traditional-modern cultural synthesis [13]. Rural consumers throughout many developing economies show cautious purchasing patterns which result from their seasonal earnings and their need to survive from day to day. The purchasing patterns of these consumers depend heavily on what their community values and what cultural traditions they follow. The majority of rural consumers do not have access to modern retail outlets so they depend on small-scale vendors who often operate informally. These consumers choose value-for-money and functional products which leads to different strategic marketing approaches in these regions [14].

2.2 Key Socio-Economic and Cultural Factors Influencing Behavior

The consumption choices of rural consumers emerge from numerous socio-economic and cultural elements which interact to determine their purchasing decisions. The ability to obtain goods and services depends primarily on a person's income level and social class [15]. People living in rural areas base their purchasing choices on these two factors which also determine if they will make purchases. Consumption patterns and product choices within communities are heavily influenced by cultural elements such as traditional customs along with festival celebrations and communal social events. A person's educational background establishes their capability to obtain and evaluate product information [16]. The life cycle stage and age of rural consumers determine their purchasing motivations since younger people tend to spend more on discretionary items than older people. Rural communities possess specific socio-cultural elements which affect financial behaviors including self-control and credit preference along with financial planning habits [17].

2.3 Rural vs. Urban Consumer Behavior: Comparative Insights

The purchasing patterns of rural and urban consumers show distinct differences when it comes to their product choices as well as their decision-making procedures. Urban consumers typically encounter more diverse choices along with forceful advertising and well-structured retail environments [18]. The purchasing decisions of rural consumers primarily depend on personal communication networks that spread information through word-of-mouth recommendations. People living in cities tend to focus on brands and aesthetics yet rural consumers focus on products which deliver practical use and long-lasting durability [19]. The difference in income levels between people creates unique patterns regarding product affordability and market access. Urban dwellers who have higher disposable income tend to choose luxury products and engage in experiential consumption. Rural consumers maintain a focus on cost-effective spending habits and conservative financial behavior. The long distance from market centers combined with inadequate infrastructure systems causes rural consumers to depend on local products from informal suppliers. Rural markets need specific marketing approaches and distribution methods which mainstream urban-focused campaigns fail to address according to [20].

2.4 Psychological and Behavioral Drivers of Rural Consumption

Rural consumption depends primarily on psychological and behavioral dynamics as its fundamental elements. The essential drivers consist of spending self-control alongside value perception as well as social status pursuit and mental budget management.  Literature-based conceptual frameworks demonstrate rural consumers make financial choices through conservative assessment because they focus on securing long-term stability instead of spontaneous purchases [21]. Social pressures together with community status function as main driving forces for buying products that show social status like mobile phones and motorcycles. Digital media exposure along with advertising has become a strong motivator for rural youth who seek to adopt urban lifestyle practices [22]. Financial literacy together with credit accessibility determines how much consumption can be enabled or restricted. People who possess better financial management abilities along with microcredit scheme access tend to spend their money in planned ways. The digital economy integration of rural markets has made psychological elements such as trust together with risk perception and brand recognition more important in shaping rural buying habits [23].

Table.1 Comparative Profile of Rural and Urban Consumers.

Table. 1. cites the contrast of rural versus city consumers reveals a number of great differences in income, education, access, and decisions. Rural consumers have seasonal incomes and existing informal markets which affect their preference for non-formal functional, convenient and inexpensive products. While urban consumers have better access to information and more organized retail, rural buyers usually depend on word-of-mouth and general opinions. Most of their payments continue to be cash based and they have limited access to digital finance. The table emphasizes the importance of marketers to utilize very localized, trust-based strategies when entering rural markets.

Table.2 Socio-Economic Drivers Influencing Rural Consumer Behavior.

Table. 2 outlines how rural purchasing behavior is influenced by individual- and community-level factors. Younger and better educated customers for instance are more adventurous, while older customers are ‘safer’ and risk cautious. Financial and credit management skills can facilitate or inhibit the opportunity to make premeditated purchases. Class and community also factor into aspirations, especially for socially visible goods like electronics and vehicles. The table shows that rural marketing with behavior segmentation need not be based on income alone and that there are other psychological and cultural factors also to be considered.

Figure.1 Shift in Rural Expenditure Patterns Over Time [24].

The spending pattern suggests a sustained decrease in the proportion of spending on necessities and a corresponding increase in discretionary and luxury spending see figure. 1. It reflects a change in rural consumer mindset led by growing incomes, more access to media and aspiration levels. Between 2000 and 2030, necessities are expected to decline from 80% to 50% and luxuries to grow to become its equivalent, as lifestyle improves. Data indicates that rural markets are no longer just subsistence driven markets; they are fast becoming consumption pockets for FMCG, electronic and lifestyle brands. Marketers need to respond with inexpensive aspirational items that provide the right mix of price and status.

3.1 Demographic Factors (Age, Gender, Education, Income)

Demographic factors work as a basic determinant in understanding rural consumer behavior. Consumption at age greatly affects preferences; In rural areas, young consumers have more inclination towards aspirational shopping, such as branded clothes and mobile phones, while older consumers often prefer functional products related to agriculture, healthcare or home needs [25]. The gender also plays an important role, while men are traditionally seen as primary decision makers, women in rural homes often make purchases for goods related to food, hygiene and domestic maintenance. Education is a strong promoter to make informed decisions. Educated rural consumers are more likely to evaluate product options, understand marketing materials and demand quality. Income, especially in rural economies, is bound by seasonal and agricultural cycles or informal labor. This cyclic nature of earning results in purchasing power and vigilant expenses behavior. Together, these demographic features help to tailor their outreach strategies, product design and price models to suit the variety found in rural population [26].

3.2 Cultural Influences (Traditions, Religion, Festivals)

Cultural values are greatly ingrained in rural societies and have a very deep impact on consumer behavior. This, in turn, is profoundly evident in nature. In numerous rural areas, the unspoken code of traditions, rituals, and community customs determines what, when and even from whom going to be purchased. Religious beliefs can be the primary factor in establishing a preference for certain types of food, clothing, or symbols among several choices. The religious concept can become the highest point of consumption events in addition to providing ideas for cooking and wardrobe [27]. The festivals are the time of the highest festivals serves as peak consumption period in the rural market. In this period, the purchase of clothing, household goods, sweets, and even durable items is very high. The purchases made are no longer just material things but also become the symbols of the family pride. Besides, the rural consumers are more likely to show that they are loyal to the brands and products that are culturally the same as they are or the ones that have been the most trustworthy in their local community [28]. Therefore, the businesses that venture into rural markets must be in tune with the local culture if they want to succeed. It follows from the fact that their marketing communications have to be in line with the prevailing cultural ethos. Also, sponsoring or participating in local festivals and events serves as a goodwill gesture, which helps to build credibility and trust in rural markets [29].

3.3 Economic Conditions (Employment, Livelihood Sources, Credit Availability)

The economic landscape of rural areas is directly reflected in consumer choices and purchasing behavior. The employment opportunities in rural areas are typically restricted to the primary sector, agriculture, seasonal work, and informal small businesses [30]. Consequently, income is low and unstable, which leads consumers to focus on basic necessities and postpone non-essential spending. In places where remittances or rural employment schemes (such as MGNREGA in India) are implemented, there is a clear growth in consumption, especially of semi-durable goods. The factor of credit availability is also of utmost importance [31]. Having access to microfinance, borrowing from informal sources, or joining self-help groups gives rural consumers the opportunity to adjust their budgets to accommodate higher-value purchases which otherwise would remain out of reach. But, on the other side, lack of financial literacy and fear of debt may prevent them from doing so. The involvement of cooperatives, rural banks, and mobile payment systems is gradually transforming this situation, thus increasing the level of confidence and the number of planned purchases of rural consumers. Hence, economic facilitators and limitations act together as a driving force that shapes the range and the frequency of rural purchases [32].

3.4 Accessibility and Infrastructure (Roads, Digital Divide, Marketplaces)

Physical and digital infrastructure plays a very big role in shaping consumption patterns in rural areas. If the roads are not good or there is not enough transport, then it may limit access to places where people can buy and reduce the variety of goods available. Hence, rural consumers will be forced to rely on local sellers or traditional alternatives [33]. On the other hand, a lack of reliable electricity, internet, and telecommunications not only reduces exposure to advertisements, but also limits awareness of product options. The digital divide is especially glaring in rural areas, where mobile penetration is high, but the level of digital literacy is very low. Although there have been significant attempts to narrow this gap through programs run by the government and the use of low-cost smartphones, the restricted availability of digital platforms still acts as a barrier for the rural population to participate in e-commerce or the use of digital payment systems [34]. Rural areas' marketplaces are generally weekly or periodic haats, which serve as both commercial and social hubs. These places, additionally, become the means through which a consumer can have a product trial, receive seller interaction directly, and can even negotiate the price. It is clear then that infrastructure development is not only a necessity because of the logistics but also an enabler of market integration and consumer empowerment [35].

3.5 Trust and Word-of-Mouth in Rural Decision-Making

Trust forms the starting point for rural consumer behavior and often is weighed against other marketing elements like advertising or branding. In lower-literacy-low-exposure environments, the purchasing decisions are more dependent upon based on familiarity and relationships and local reputation rather than any mass communication efforts [36]. The brand or product, established on recommendation-based trust through a village leader, family member, or other local influencers, can quickly make inroads into neighboring villages. Especially in the sectors that require the highest amounts of risky consideration like healthcare, finance, and agri-inputs, the trust-based model was quite indispensable [37]. Through sales channels and suppliers with whom the customer gets to keep long-term relations, loyalty could be established, either through after-sales support or involvement in social activities. In comparison, hard selling approaches, which do not require any human interaction to complete the sale on the other hand, tend not to convert. Rural sustenance rests on trust-building endeavors, which include integrity of service, reliability of products, and localized engagement [38].

Figure.2 Changing Trends in Rural Consumer Spending by Product Category (2000–2030).

The line graph shows the shift in rural consumer expenditures in the assumed figure. It started in 2000 and goes on until the projected values in 2030, showing a steady decline in the spending on basic necessities and a concomitant rise on semi-durables and aspirational goods. This is in line with the first trends of rising income levels, changing aspirations, and the gradual metamorphosis of rural consumption patterns from a subsistence-based to a lifestyle-oriented pattern of consumption [39].

4. Role of Social Interventions in Influencing Rural Consumer Behavior

By raising disposable income, boosting purchasing power, and enhancing access to necessary services, government-led programs and subsidies have been absolutely instrumental in transforming rural consumer behavior [40]. Providing 100 days of wage employment to rural families, the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) is a flagship program in this area. It has been praised for not only lowering rural unemployment but also for encouraging women to enter the labor force and moderating seasonal migration [41]. Assuring income flow improves the capacity of rural homes to engage in consumption beyond survival, therefore facilitating access to consumer products and services. Moreover, programs like the Public Distribution System (PDS) guarantee subsidized food grains to the economically weaker segments, therefore freeing up funds for other consumption needs. These government actions act as demand stimulants that cause consumer behavior to change from necessity-only spending to varied purchases, including healthcare, education, and household utilities [42].

Rural customers, particularly women, have also been enabled to make independent purchasing decisions thanks to the growing number of microfinance institutions (MFIs), self-help groups (SHGs), and financial literacy projects. SHGs have not only made it easier for people to access loans and savings but also cultivated a culture of communal entrepreneurialship and group accountability [43]. This financial inclusion has triggered a behavioral change among rural customers from reliance to agency, enabling them to invest in home improvements, children's education, even small businesses, productive assets [44]. Women SHG members show a great inclination to spend on healthcare and long-lasting products, as seen in numerous areas, therefore mirroring their increasing decision-making influence in homes. Financial literacy programs have also helped to propel this change by raising rural inhabitants' knowledge of savings, credit, and digital payment systems, therefore encouraging informed consumption behavior [45].

Rural development has greatly benefited from non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and community-based efforts [46]. NGOs assist to close the gap between policy development and on-ground implementation by providing last-mile connectivity, capacity building, and complaint resolution; often stepped in where government outreach has been inadequate or nonexistent. NGOs affect both the supply and demand side of rural consumer behavior [47] via focused initiatives including livelihood generation training, skill development, health awareness, and sanitation drives. Operating within community norms and using local leadership networks helps them build trust and promote behavioral change. Their initiatives usually cause a change in priorities from quick consumption to long-term investments in health, education, and hygiene [48].

Targeting health, cleanliness, and education, social development campaigns have also significantly changed rural consumption patterns [49]. Government-led Swachh Bharat Abhiyan (Clean India Mission), immunization drives, and Beti Bachao Beti Padhao (Save and Educate the Girl Child) have transformed rural mindsets and promoted behavior grounded in well-being and aspiring living [50]. Such campaigns reinforce social norms that influence consumption choices, such purchasing hygiene products, enrolling girls in school, or pursuing institutional healthcare [51]. These behavioral nudges have long-term effects as they translate into continuous demand for improved infrastructure, communication technology, and higher quality consumer goods. Together, these social interventions contribute to a cumulative impact—empowerment of rural consumers. As interventions improve education, income, and access to services, rural people develop aspirational identities that influence their consumption behavior [52]. Empowerment also enhances institutional trust, allowing greater adoption of digital platforms, credit systems, and formal markets [53]. Word-of-mouth, peer influence, and community validation continue to shape these decisions, but the underlying motives are now rooted in a sense of agency and future orientation. Thus, the intersection of welfare schemes, financial tools, civil society activities, and targeted initiatives has transformed rural consumption from a survival-centric model to a multidimensional, dynamic process [54]

Table.3 MGNREGA Employment trend (2008-2023) [55].

Figure.3 Employment Trends under MGNREGA (2008–2023) [56].

The graph illustrates the yearly count of rural homes supplied employment under the MGNREGA initiative. It shows how important the programme is for rural livelihoods, particularly during financial crises such as the COVID-19 epidemic.

Between 2008 and 2023, the trend in rural employment under the MGNREGA program is seen on the line graph shown in figure 3. Following modest early development, the program saw a temporary drop in attendance blamed on policy delays and funding challenges. Demand for rural employment soared in 2020–21 during the COVID-19 epidemic as a result of reverse migration and urban job loss, leading to a sharp rise. Though the numbers somewhat decreased following the epidemic, the quantity of homes served is far above pre-2020 levels refer table. 3. This shows both the persistent need for rural job assistance and the program's changing role as a consumer enabler in rural India.

5.1 Evolution of Rural Marketing Strategies

Rural marketing approaches in poor countries have seen a major transformation in the previous twenty years. Initially, marketing to rural consumers was an afterthought; urban-centric products were offloaded to rural areas without localizing, relevancy, or communication clarity [57]. Firms had to rethink their strategy, nevertheless, with the rising purchasing power of rural India and more media exposure and infrastructure developments. Modern rural marketing emphasizes value-based engagement, whereby companies tailor their product and communication based on thorough understanding of rural lifestyles, community structures, and consumption psychology [58]. Recent research shows that this change has moved marketing from experience-driven loyalty including cultural alignment, pricing flexibility, and local messaging to basic availability. Today's rural customer is not only cost-conscious but also quality-aware and aspirational-driven. This has resulted in hybrid marketing strategies combining data-driven insights [59] with conventional outreach.

5.2 4A Framework (Affordability, Availability, Awareness, Acceptability)

The 4A framework—Affordability, Availability, Awareness, and Acceptability—offers a strong model for efficient serving and comprehension of rural customers. As observed in the Analytical Study (2021), affordability is most important since rural earnings remain unstable and often below ₹5000 per month. Companies have turned to low-unit pricing schemes like sachets or ₹5 packets [60] to solve this. Scattered demand centers and bad road infrastructure make availability a logistical problem. Overcoming this requires companies employ mobile vans, village stockists, and last-mile delivery via local entrepreneurs or SHG networks. Another obstacle is awareness since conventional marketing is sometimes useless [61]. Rural customers depend more on personal contacts such friends, family, or regional leaders. Accordingly, regional dialects now include wall paintings, street dramas, and audio commercials in awareness campaigns. Acceptability is related to social relevance—rural consumers only buy items that fit local values, religious beliefs, and usage habits. Companies that have changed their offering to meet local preferences, utility, or prestige (e. g. , color preferences, packaging symbols) have seen greatly increased penetration and repeat buys [62].

5.3 Product Localization and Innovation

Driven by the need to match products with local preferences, customs, and culture standards, product localization has become a key success driver in rural marketing. Leading FMCG businesses like HUL, ITC, and Godrej have launched product versions designed especially for rural areas—both in size and content [63]. Low-lather shampoos, herbal toothpastes, and single-use hygiene supplies are some instances of such products. These items are usually created following consumer input loops or field studies, with adjustments in packaging language, symbolic representation (e. g. , utilizing recognizable symbols like cows, grain, or temple images), and usability design (e. g. , robust packaging for outside storage or water-efficient soap formulas) [64]. Semi-durables and electronics also show creativity as brands release solar-based items or rugged mobile phones with extended battery life for places without much power. Significantly, localization entails contextual creativity bridging the gap between capability and ambition—it goes beyond simple affordability. The popularity of locally produced goods supports the idea that rural customers value customization when it elevates pride or convenience [65].

5.4 Distribution Models (Haats, Vans, Rural Retailing)

The most difficult challenge of rural marketing remains distribution, the bedrock of it. Traditional models depend much on weekly haats, when consumers from many towns meet to buy and mingle [66]. Vendors can expect high footfall and trust-based sales from these haats. Kirana businesses and rural dukaans operate with deep personal relationships and credit offers, which urban retail models lack. Because of infrastructural bottlenecks, businesses have come up with mobile van distribution, in which cars act as mobile stores traveling a route covering several communities. These vans allow sampling, present goods, and even collect orders for repeat delivery [67]. Businesses also work with village-level entrepreneurs (VLEs), who store and market items from their homes or kiosks. Such strategies improve product availability and lower last-mile logistics expenses. In eastern and central India, some pilot projects also combine SHG distribution with digital payment solutions. Rural distribution is getting more organized generally, yet local trust, informal networks, and seasonal movement adaptability remain highly important [68].

5.5 Communication Strategies (Vernacular Media, Folk Culture, Digital Campaigns)

In rural regions, good communication demands cultural immersion instead of only translation. Rural customers relate best to messaging that mirrors their experiences, ideas, and language [69]. Companies using vernacular communication including Bhojpuri, Tamil, Punjabi, and Marathi report improved recall and engagement. Especially when paired with health, education, or social topics [70], traditional media including puppet shows, nukkad nataks (street plays), and local song-based storytelling remain extremely potent. These techniques go beyond being humorous; they instill brand principles in familiar cultural settings. Digital campaigns via YouTube and mobile phones have grown recently, yet these are most effective in places with adolescent literacy and mobile access [71]. Many businesses therefore blend digital content with conventional communication like sponsored temple fairs or community activities. Posters and audio jingles often incorporate symbolic references and visual cues—like harvest celebrations or gods. Brands must communicate both relevance and aspiration as country consumers get more aspirational by using language that mirrors familiarity and storytelling that stimulates.

6.1 Penetration of Smartphones and Mobile Internet

The quick spread of mobile internet and cellphones has mostly driven the digital revolution of rural India. Seventy-two percent of rural respondents said they had cell phones as of 2022; 55% had regular internet access, therefore indicating a significant change in connectivity and access across rural areas [72]. Rural consumers have been able to move from passive receivers of information to active contributors to the digital economy thanks to this development. Mobile devices have become multipurpose gateways to business, education, finance, and healthcare as a result of better 4G and now 5G infrastructure; they are no longer only means of communication. Projections indicate that rural areas will produce 56% of all new internet users in India by 2025, hence underlining the importance of rural markets in determining digital India's direction [73].

6.2 Role of Social Media and E-commerce in Influencing Behavior

Rising as powerful influencers in defining rural consumer behavior have been social media sites like WhatsApp, Facebook, and YouTube. More than 68% of rural smartphone users interact every day with social media sites where peer opinions, video material, and vernacular communication support product discovery and trust [74]. Particularly with the advent of social commerce, in which people explore and debate brands, offer local product suggestions, and get educational materials, these platforms have become virtual marketplaces. Simultaneously, 42% of rural customers indicate monthly interaction with internet shopping, particularly for inexpensive and ambitious items like clothing, electronics, and cosmetics. Digital exposure is also improving brand awareness and loyalty as companies more and more use rural influencers, regional language content, and micro-targeted advertising to penetrate deep into the hinterland [75].

6.3 Digital Payment Adoption in Rural Areas

Once seen as urban-centric, digital payment systems have now found their place in the rural trading environment. India had about 338 million digital payment customers as of 2022, 36% of them coming from rural areas, with 99% using UPI-based platforms like Google Pay, PhonePe, and BHIM [76]. Government-led financial inclusion programs, Jan Dhan accounts, and cheaper cell phones have sped up this rise. Small-value transactions are becoming more and more digital by rural consumers at kirana stores, agricultural input outlets, and even haat bazaars. Even with reservations about digital literacy and infrastructure gaps, voice-assisted apps and QR codes are streamlining the payment process and enabling frictionless digital financial inclusion [77].

6.4 Case Studies of Tech-Led Rural Engagement

Several case studies showing the changing capability of digital technologies in rural marketing abound. As a major engagement tool for rural SMEs and agri-brands, WhatsApp marketing has been expanding [78]. Product catalogues, pricing changes, and seasonal promotions are often transmitted to farmers and housewives through broadcast lists or local WhatsApp groups. Likewise, vernacular YouTube channels have emerged as important venues for influencing purchasing decisions—whether for herbal medicine items, agricultural tools, or mobile phone reviews [79].

Following regional YouTube reviews, a Bihar case noted a 35% rise in rural internet purchases. E-commerce sites like Meesho and Flipkart have also promoted their rural outreach through localized influencer-led initiatives. These examples demonstrate how technologically driven; inexpensive, high-trust solutions are changing consumer empowerment in the digital era as well as marketing [80].

Figure.4 Digital Inclusion in Rural India (2015–2025) [81].

The graph shows the adoption trends of smartphones, internet connectivity, and digital payments in rural India. Rising trajectory shows a sustained digital transformation driven by affordability, governmental backing, and more digital literacy, therefore underlining the increasing importance of e-commerce and digital marketing techniques in rural areas refer figure. 4 [82-86].

7.1 Infrastructural Bottlenecks and Logistic Hurdles

Particularly in low- and middle-income nations (LMICs), SBCC initiatives utilizing digital tools have significant infrastructural and logistical constraints. These problems arise from a shaky power supply, restricted internet penetration, poor mobile network coverage, and underdeveloped healthcare and communication systems. For instance, even with the expanding reach of mobile technologies, digital health initiatives frequently fall short because of execution in environments without strong telecommunication infrastructure [87], so compromising scaling and consistency.

Furthermore, slowing the successful execution of SBCC initiatives are supply-side problems including scarcity of medical goods, lack of transportation infrastructure, and ineffective distribution systems. Though regarded a success, programs like MomConnect in South Africa needed major infrastructure for message transmission and data gathering—underscoring the reliance on system readiness [88]. Campbell Systematic Reviews adds that uneven geographic dispersion of services and physical access to amenities create substantial obstacles for last-mile populations, where SBCC could otherwise bridge awareness and behavior gaps. These logistical shortcomings also hamper stakeholder coordination and postpone quick answers to public health demands. Multisectoral planning—that is, combining investment in telecommunications, transportation, and human resource training—is needed to solve infrastructural constraints. Integration with national eHealth plans and strengthening of health information systems is essential to increase the resilience and scalability of SBCC efforts [89].

7.2 Literacy and Communication Barriers

Low literacy among target populations, particularly among rural communities and women in LMICs, is a major impediment to SBCC effectiveness. Under these circumstances, conventional text-based communications such SMS become less successful, hence weakening efforts aimed at enhancing health-seeking habits. Low overall and health literacy levels might restrict understanding of communications even when mobile penetration is strong, as reported in the literature. Though effective, programs like MAMA and Kilkari show reach and effectiveness in low-literacy communities [90]. Voice messages and interactive voice response (IVR) systems have been suggested as substitutes, but they also have problems including low involvement, language dialect variation, and difficulty retaining complex data.

Cultural and gender-based constraints worsen these communication difficulties. For instance, in some societies, women may not have their own access to mobile phones or may not be allowed to interact with media material unsupervised. Furthermore, isolating important groups is the lack of message phrasing customization and the incapacity to communicate culturally relevant content. Employing pictorial aids, vernacular storytelling, and community mobilizers as mediators helps to get rid of these obstacles. Inclusive co-design with target audiences helps to guarantee that health messages are understandable and pertinent [91].

7. Inadequate Data and Market Research

Good SBCC initiatives depend on exact, regional data to customize messages, spot behavioral motivators, and assess effects. Nevertheless, both reports draw attention to a major lack in strong, context-specific data and market research in SBCC programs. The Campbell Review observes a dearth of top-quality assessments and randomized studies in many areas, therefore impeding evidence-based decision-making [92].

Health projects frequently use generic messages that do not meet the unique needs of varied communities without trustworthy baseline data. This is especially difficult in multilingual or multicultural environments where behavioral drivers vary greatly. Moreover, the inability to precisely identify at-risk populations is hampered by the lack of broken-out data by gender, age, socioeconomic level, and location. Most SBCC digital investigations have been carried out in a small number of nations (e. g. , China, Kenya, India), which causes geographical prejudices in intervention design and effectiveness assessment, according to the S49 article. Interventions are therefore seldom transferable or scalable to other settings. This gulf may be bridged by better data systems using integrated health information platforms and by using mobile-based real-time feedback systems. Partnership with regional institutions, non-governmental organizations, and community networks for formative research can also deepen the market intelligence needed for powerful SBCC [94].

7.4 Cultural Resistance and Misinformation

Acceptance of health-related messages is greatly hampered by cultural norms, misunderstandings, and stigmatization. Topics relating to reproductive health—like family planning, HIV/AIDS, or menstruation—often face opposition because of taboos and false information spread via casual community networks. Both papers highlight that digital SBCC campaigns sometimes overlook the need of societal context, therefore causing message rejection or opposition. Incorrect health communication, especially when not changed to fit local customs and beliefs, might strengthen rather than refute false information. Furthermore, in places lacking enough health infrastructure, rumors and cynicism can swiftly erode evidence-based communication.

The digital sphere also facilitates fast dissemination of erroneous information. While platforms like WhatsApp or Facebook can spread health messages, they are also incubator for unconfirmed claims—double-edged swords. According to the S49 report, peer-to–peer communication must be meticulously managed to avoid false information. Cultural adaptation, participatory communication techniques, and integration with well regarded community figures (e. g. , religious leaders, traditional healers) can reduce reluctance and advance acceptance [95].

7.5 Trust Deficit in Formal Systems

A major barrier to SBCC success is the widespread skepticism of official healthcare systems and government actions. Communities might start to eye official messages with suspicion as a result of historical disregard, political instability, corruption, or bad healthcare encounters. Though encouraging, digital health initiatives might be rejected if received from obscure numbers or connected to organizations devoid of reliability. Studies examined in the S49 report demonstrate that even when well-structured interventions are employed, uptake is constrained if people disbelieve the messenger independent of the veracity of the message.

This lack is especially serious during health crises (e. g. , epidemics, vaccinations deployments) when quick behavioral change is required. The 2014 Ebola outbreak showed how trust affects health system responsiveness; mistrust slowed adoption of preventive actions, as observed in the mass SMS campaign in Senegal. SBCC initiatives have to invest in long-term trust-building by guaranteeing transparency, involving communities, and utilizing consistent, relatable spokespersons to solve this. Integrating user feedback systems and demonstrating responsiveness will slowly change attitudes [96].

Future initiatives have to use a more strategic, data-driven, and locally sensitive approach to guarantee the inclusion and long-term viability of Social and Behavioral Change Communication (SBCC) programs in low- and middle-income nations (LMICs). One of the most immediate requirements is for data-driven, granular rural market analysis. Many modern SBCC initiatives suffer from a dearth of local knowledge about behavioral patterns, health factors, and socio-economic dynamics. Real-time geo-tagged data systems—integrated with national health information systems—can help better segmentation, targeting, and assessment of SBCC initiatives. Such data will help stakeholders to identify community-specific obstacles and possibilities, hence guiding exact and effective programs. Personalizing communication via community-based techniques is equally important. Adapting communications to relate to local cultural contexts, languages, and belief systems raises the chances of acceptance and behavioral change. Digital platforms can enable this by means of machine learning algorithms that alter material according on user engagement, demographics, and comments. Effective implementation of this calls, nevertheless, for community mobilizers, peer educators, and local influencers that build confidence and relevance. Combining human mediators with digital outreach results in a blended model honoring community knowledge as well as the extent of technology.

Additionally, critical is the promotion of ethical and sustainable marketing techniques. Particularly in delicate fields like reproductive health or disease prevention, SBCC initiatives should be in line with openness, inclusiveness, and non-exploitative communication. Interventions should avoid coercive messaging and guarantee informed choice. Regulatory structures need to be created to control the ethics of content distribution, particularly on digital and social media sites where fake news can spread. Parallel, promoting rural entrepreneurship and improving supply networks is crucial to support SBCC messages with actual product and service access. Encouragement of maternal health, for instance, should coincide with the availability of antenatal supplements, clean delivery kits, or transportation options. Giving rural micro-entrepreneurs—especially women—as distribution agents or health ambassadors local ownership and financial incentives improves both influence and sustainability. Ultimately, scaling such complex interventions calls for strong public-private partnerships (PPPs) among governments, civil society, health agencies, telecom providers, and private corporations to combine resources, share data, and innovate delivery mechanisms. Successful SBCC programs like MomConnect in South Africa and M4RH have shown the power of PPPs in attaining scale and sustainability. These alliances must be institutionalized with clearly defined roles, performance indicators, and accountability structures to guarantee long-term success and neighborhood confidence.

In conclusion, policy changes, growing aspirations, and digital connectivity are all contributing to the significant transformation of the rural consumer ecosystem. Nonetheless, there are still disparities in the efficacy of SBCC interventions in promoting long-lasting behavior change, mostly as a result of enduring trust issues, cultural barriers, and infrastructure deficiencies. As this review demonstrates, closing these gaps calls for a multifaceted approach that incorporates technological advancements with behavioral insights, ethical considerations, and local context. SBCC's future depends on its capacity to use detailed, real-time data to create interventions that are not only educational but also emotionally and culturally relevant. Delivered through both digital and human channels, personalization of content guarantees that messages are not only received but also comprehended and internalized. Message credibility and trust have been found to be particularly enhanced by community-based models that empower local influencers and frontline workers.

Promoting moral and environmentally friendly marketing strategies is equally crucial. To combat misinformation and exploitation, interventions must be based on openness, consent, and inclusivity. The rural consumer is an active participant with changing needs and expectations rather than a passive recipient. SBCC must therefore transition from one-way communication to interactive participation. A parallel strategy for integrating behavioral change into daily economic life is to support rural supply chains and entrepreneurship. SBCC promotes social and economic empowerment when it is linked to livelihood opportunities, like educating rural women to distribute products or promote health. Additionally, this localized entrepreneurship facilitates innovation, feedback, and the development of trust.  Last but not least, establishing strong public-private partnerships is essential to expanding effective models. SBCC strategies must be jointly developed and implemented by governments, non-governmental organizations, tech firms, and healthcare providers with shared accountability. These collaborations ought to be incorporated into long-term development frameworks with explicit evaluation metrics rather than existing on an as-needed basis. In the end, the way forward necessitates an integrative strategy that blends information, respect, and communication. In rural areas, SBCC can be a transformative force in attaining sustainable development and health equity by emphasizing inclusion over outreach and empowerment over persuasion.

1. Contreras-Velásquez JC, Riaño-Garzon M, Arias JAL, Hernández-Ramírez J, Castro RP, Parias CHG. Low-Income Consumer Behavior: A Literature Review. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental [Internet]. 2024 Sep 11;18(10):e06059. Available from: https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n10-033
2. Schiffman, L. G., & Kanuk, L. L. (1997). Consumer Behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Hall. - References - Scientific Research Publishing [Internet]. www.scirp.org. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2862944
3. Hogg M. Consumer behaviour: a European perspective, 3rd ed. Pearson eBooks [Internet]. 2006 Jan 1; Available from: https://www.academia.edu/113208540/Consumer_behaviour_a_European_perspective_3rd_ed
4. Prahalad CK, Hammond A. Serving the World’s Poor, Profitably [Internet]. Harvard Business Review. 2002. Available from: https://hbr.org/2002/09/serving-the-worlds-poor-profitably
5. London T, Anupindi R, Sheth S. Creating mutual value: Lessons learned from ventures serving base of the pyramid producers. Journal of Business Research [Internet]. 2010 Jun;63(6):582–94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.04.025
6. Yang J, Mai E (Shirley). Experiential goods with network externalities effects: An empirical study of online rating system. Journal of Business Research [Internet]. 2010 Sep [cited 2020 Nov 9];63(9-10):1050–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.04.029
7. Garbinsky EN, Gladstone JJ. The Consumption Consequences of Couples Pooling Finances. Journal of Consumer Psychology [Internet]. 2018 Dec 27;29(3):353–69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1083
8. Taylor NL. Gaining Perspective on ObesityObesity: Cultural and Biocultural Perspectives. By Alexandra A. Brewis. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2011. Current Anthropology [Internet]. 2011 Oct;52(5):757–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/661930
9. Adkins N, Ozanne Julie L. The Low Literate Consumer. Journal of Consumer Research [Internet]. 2005 Jun;32(1):93–105. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/429603
10. Belk RW, Ger G, Askegaard S. The Fire of Desire: A Multisited Inquiry into Consumer Passion. Journal of Consumer Research [Internet]. 2003 Dec;30(3):326–51. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1086/378613
11. Subrahmanyan, S., & Gomez-Arias, J. T. (2008). Integrated Approach to Understanding Consumer Behavior at Bottom of Pyramid. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25, 402-412. - References - Scientific Research Publishing [Internet]. Scirp.org. 2021 [cited 2025 Jul 20]. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2947846
12. Fulbrook M. German national identity after the Holocaust [Internet]. Cambridge: Polity Press ; Maldon, Ma; 2007. Available from: https://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail?book_slug=consumer-culture-and-modernity--9780745610453
13. Tzanelli R. The “Mangle” of Human Practice. Transfers [Internet]. 2018 Jun 1 [cited 2019 Dec 19];8(2):129–32. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326526832
14. Singh DP, Paul J, Sharma P. Segmenting the Bottom of the Pyramid Consumers: Theoretical Approach. International Journal of Market Research [Internet]. 2021 Nov 22;147078532110550. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14707853211055048
15. Euromonitor International | Strategic Market Research, Data & Analysis [Internet]. Euromonitor.com. 2024. Available from: https://www.euromonitor.com/
16. Kochhar R. A global middle class is more promise than reality. Routledge eBooks [Internet]. 2020 May 21;15–48. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003049630-3/global-middle-class-promise-reality-rakesh-kochhar
17. World Bank . Global Economic Prospects [Internet]. World Bank. 2024. Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/global-economic-prospects
18. The Economist Intelligence Unit [Internet]. Economist Intelligence Unit. 2019. Available from: https://www.eiu.com/n/
19. Explore Our Featured Insights [Internet]. McKinsey & Company. 2019. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights
20. Hundred O, Congress F, Session Thursday. HEARI NG O N CH I NA’ S BELT AND ROAD I NIT IAT IVE: FIVE YEARS LAT ER HEARING BEFORE THE [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/transcripts/Hearing%20Transcript%20-%20January%2025%2C%202018_0.pdf
21. Sinem Arıkan Kargı, Ozturk A. Subcontractor Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. Business and Economics Research Journal [Internet]. 2012 Jul [cited 2025 Jul 20];3(3). Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254448496
22. Panchout K. Engaging With The Luxury Consumer In China. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks [Internet]. 2013 Jan 1 [cited 2023 Dec 6];89–100. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137287397_7
23. Banerjee D, Shivani S. Has Modern Retailing in India Influenced the Consumption Expenditure Behavior of Urban Socioeconomic Classes? Indian Journal of Marketing [Internet]. 2015 Jun 1 [cited 2020 Dec 11];45(6):37. Available from: https://indianjournalofmarketing.com/index.php/ijom/article/view/79932
24. Marquis C, Raynard M. Institutional Strategies in Emerging Markets. SSRN Electronic Journal [Internet]. 2014;9(1). Available from: https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/15-013_c89a2f1f-141e-44b9-b917-a9a5dcef54a7.pdf
25. Hadi DP, Riyanto, Wahyuhastuti N, Wuryandini E, Putra FD. Sustainability Strategy in the Development of Msmes By Bank Indonesia in Increasing Economic Growth by Using Green Economic Policy As An Intervening Variable. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental [Internet]. 2024 Dec 2 [cited 2025 Jul 20];18(12):e011090. Available from: https://rgsa.openaccesspublications.org/rgsa/article/view/11090
26. Oodith PD, Parumasur SB. TAPPING INTO THE BOTTOM OF THE PYRAMID (BOP) MARKET IN SOUTH AFRICA: POSSIBLE? AND HOW? Corporate Ownership and Control [Internet]. 2013;11(1). Available from: http://www.virtusinterpress.org/IMG/pdf/10-22495_cocv11i1c2art6.pdf
27. Durmaz Y, Tasdemir A. (PDF) A Theoretical Approach to the Influence of Social Class on Consumer Behavior [Internet]. ResearchGate. 2014. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265020500_A_Theoretical_Approach_to_the_Influence_of_Social_Class_on_Consumer_Behavior
28. Iacobucci D, Ostrom A. Commercial and interpersonal relationships; Using the structure of interpersonal relationships to understand individual-to-individual, individual-to-firm, and firm-to-firm relationships in commerce. International Journal of Research in Marketing [Internet]. 1996 Feb;13(1):53–72. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167811695000348
29. Steenkamp JBEM, Burgess SM. Optimum stimulation level and exploratory consumer behavior in an emerging consumer market. International Journal of Research in Marketing [Internet]. 2002 Jun;19(2):131–50. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167811602000630
30. De Paula TM, Peñaloza V. Life satisfaction, consumption adequacy and social comparison in social deprivation environments. International Journal of Social Economics [Internet]. 2024 Aug 27 [cited 2024 Oct 18]; Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ijse-08-2023-0623/full/pdf?title=life-satisfaction-consumption-adequacy-and-social-comparison-in-social-deprivation-environments
31. Eichert CA. Almost Equal: Consumption under Fragmented Stigma[“The Low Literate Consumer]. Journal of Consumer Research [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Jul 20];49(3):409–29. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v49y2022i3p409-429..html
32. Sarial-Abi G, Ulqinaku A. Financial Constraints Influence How Consumers Evaluate Approach-Framed versus Avoidance-Framed Messages. Journal of Advertising [Internet]. 2020 May 26 [cited 2020 Aug 1];49(3):270–91. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341277247_Financial_Constraints_Influence_How_Consumers_Evaluate_Approach-_versus_Avoidance-Framed_Messages
33. Putra M, Ratnasari R, Prasetyo A. RELIGIOSITY EFFECT ANALYSIS OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOR AND CONSUMER INTENTION ON ONLINE SHOPPING: EAST JAVA COMMUNITY CASE STUDY. Academic Research International [Internet]. 2017;8(4). Available from: http://www.savap.org.pk/journals/ARInt./Vol.8(4)/ARInt.2017(8.4-09).pdf
34. Solomon, M., Bamossy, G. J., Askegaard, S., & Hogg, M. K. Consumer Behaviour: A European Perspective (3rd Edition) - Research Portal | Lancaster University [Internet]. Lancs.ac.uk. 2012. Available from: http://www.research.lancs.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/consumer-behaviour-a-european-perspective-3rd-edition(07281ebb-20f0-4907-8b56-6bca86b2b9c1)/export.html
35. Mathur N. Consumer Culture, Modernity and Identity [Internet]. SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd eBooks. SAGE Publishing; 2014 [cited 2024 May 16]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4135/9789351507932
36. Babič Š. “Is Saving the World’S Poor Profitably” Good for Business and Good for the World’S Poor?. CRIS - Bulletin of the Centre for Research and Interdisciplinary Study [Internet]. 2013 Jan 1 [cited 2019 Jul 7];2013(1). Available from: http://archive.sciendo.com/CRIS/cris.2013.2013.issue-1/cris-2013-0002/cris-2013-0002.pdf
37. Cavusgil ST, Deligonul S, Kardes I, Cavusgil E. Middle-Class Consumers in Emerging Markets: Conceptualization, Propositions, and Implications for International Marketers. Journal of International Marketing [Internet]. 2018 Sep;26(3):94–108. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1509/jim.16.0021
38. Groen JJJ, Pesenti PA. Commodity Prices, Commodity Currencies, and Global Economic Developments. SSRN Electronic Journal [Internet]. 2009; Available from: https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c11856/c11856.pdf
39. Smoleń E. How Global Brands Compete [Internet]. Academia.edu. 2019 [cited 2025 Jul 20]. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/download/61447129/HBR20191207-111020-dvrvl1.pdf
40. Panda S. A REVIEW OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES IN INDIA [Internet]. International Journal of Research in Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2013 [cited 2025 Jul 20]. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/download/31949893/21-47-1-SM.pdf
41. Shekhar S. MNREGA-Programme Details, Critical Analysis, & Alternatives [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2025 Jul 20]. Available from: https://ccsinternship.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/325_mnrega-programme-details-critical-analysis-and-alternatives_shreyes-shekhar.pdf
42. Arun, Kumar A. Critical Evaluation of Poverty Alleviation Schemes in Rural Areas of India. International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research & Development (IJASRD) [Internet]. 2023 Aug [cited 2025 Jul 20];8(8):1249–58. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373638293
43. Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Gurantee Act [Internet]. nrega.nic.in. Available from: https://nrega.nic.in/netnrega/home.aspx
44. Chakrabarti S, Mukherjee A. National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme of India: Some Conceptual Problems. International Critical Thought [Internet]. 2013 Mar [cited 2021 Apr 28];3(1):1–19. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21598282.2013.761441
45. Desai RM, Joshi S. Collective Action and Community Development: Evidence from Self-Help Groups in Rural India. The World Bank Economic Review [Internet]. 2013 Sep 7;28(3):492–524. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/wber/article-abstract/28/3/492/1678377
46. Atiba Batul M. SHG-Bank Linkage Programme & Trend of Its Effective Intervention in Economic Upliftment. wwwijbmmcom International Journal of Business Marketing and Management [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Jul 20];6:2456–4559. Available from: http://ijbmm.com/paper/June2021/8340436239.pdf
47. Singh AK. Caste – the actual cost of empowerment? : Dalit women & NREGA - a study of the poverty, social exclusion & shame nexus. Oslometno [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2025 Jul 20]; Available from: https://oda.oslomet.no/handle/10642/1804
48. Kamath R. National rural employment guarantee act: An effective safety net? IIMB Management Review [Internet]. 2010 Mar [cited 2019 Jul 27];22(1-2):42–55. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0970389610000054
49. Khera R. The Battle for Employment Guarantee [Internet]. Philpapers.org. 2022 [cited 2025 Jul 20]. Available from: https://philpapers.org/rec/KHETBF
50. Dash AK, Dash RK. Environmental and sustainability campaigns: a case study of India’s Swachh Bharat Abhiyan (2014–2019). Journal of Communication Management [Internet]. 2021 May 5;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JCOM-07-2020-0072
51. Chawla A. Rural India, the problem of Open Defecation and India’s Public Health Programs: Lessons in Social Learning. Nusantara Journal of Behavioral and Social Science [Internet]. 2024 Nov 30;3(4):185–90. Available from: https://ukinstitute.org/journals/4/njbss/article/view/66
52. Biju DS, Tantia V. Social capital in the form of self-help groups in India: a powerful resilient solution to reduce household financial vulnerability. Social Work With Groups [Internet]. 2023 Sep 12 [cited 2025 Jan 24];47(3):282–95. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01609513.2023.2257754
53. Sindakis S, Showkat G. The Digital Revolution in India: Bridging the Gap in Rural Technology Adoption. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship [Internet]. 2024 May 14;13(1):1–28. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13731-024-00380-w
54. Naidu L, Bhagwan P. AN EXPLORATION OF COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IN RURAL INDIA: A CASE STUDY OF THE BHAGAT PHOOL SINGH MAHILA VISHWAVIDYALAYA (WOMEN’S UNIVERSITY) Date [Internet]. Available from: https://scholar.archive.org/work/lhvwolx2srfbxkxdgukmibm2ca/access/wayback/https://openscholar.dut.ac.za/bitstream/10321/3306/1/NAIDUL_2019.pdf
55. Rizvi N, Law College G, Gwalior M. Cover POVERTY ALLEVIATION THROUGH EMPLOYMENT: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF MGNREGA IN INDIA [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jul 20]. Available from: http://ijmer.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/volume14/volume14-issue3(2)/15.pdf
56. Khan K. Dynamics of Rural Development in India [Internet]. www.intechopen.com. IntechOpen; 2021. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/78539
57. Roy G, Debnath R, Mitra PS, Shrivastava AK. Analytical study of low-income consumers’ purchase behaviour for developing marketing strategy. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management [Internet]. 2021 Jun 1;12. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13198-021-01143-6
58. Pels J, Sheth JN. Business models to serve low-income consumers in emerging markets. Marketing Theory [Internet]. 2017 Apr 11;17(3):373–91. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1470593117704262
59. Uttam K, Thangeda R. Unwrapped Voices: Thematic Mapping of Consumer Behavior at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Journal of Poverty [Internet]. 2024 Aug 6;1–30. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10875549.2024.2379771
60. Raja SS, Raju V, Husnain M, Sarfraz S, Malik F, Raja SS. Framework for Sustainable Rural Development through Entrepreneurial Initiatives in Emerging Economies. Sustainability [Internet]. 2022 Sep 22;14(19):11972. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11972
61. Book Reviews. Society and Economy In Central and Eastern Europe ǀ Journal of the Corvinus University of Budapest [Internet]. 2013;35(4):573–87. Available from: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=622820
62. Theodora N. Relationship Between Integrated Marketing Communication and Brand Equity. International Journal of Social Science and Business [Internet]. 2021 Jun 13;5(2). Available from: https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJSSB/article/view/33782
63. Belk R, Llamas R. The Routledge Handbook of Digital Consumption [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781003317524&type=googlepdf
64. Biswal SK, Sreekumar NA, Panda AK. Evaluating retail store image - an empirical study in India. International Journal of Business Excellence [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Nov 30];9(1):68. Available from: https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJBEX.2016.073376
65. Duarte V, Zuniga-Jara S, Contreras S. Machine Learning and Marketing: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access [Internet]. 2022;10:1–1. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9869838/
66. Samiee S, Katsikeas CS, Hult GTM. The overarching role of international marketing: Relevance and centrality in research and practice. Journal of International Business Studies [Internet]. 2021 May 18;52(8). Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41267-021-00433-2
67. Kumar V, Nim N, Sharma A. Driving growth of Mwallets in emerging markets: a retailer’s perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science [Internet]. 2018 Nov 12;47(4):747–69. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11747-018-0613-6
68. Milind Trivikram Phadtare. Project Marketing [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Jul 20]. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780429329647/project-marketing-milind-trivikram-phadtare
69. Saldanha TJV, Mithas S, Krishnan MS. Leveraging Customer Involvement for Fueling Innovation: The Role of Relational and Analytical Information Processing Capabilities. MIS Quarterly [Internet]. 2017;41(1):267–86. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26629647
70. Knapik W, Król K. Inclusion of Vanishing Cultural Heritage in a Sustainable Rural Development Strategy–Prospects, Opportunities, Recommendations. Sustainability [Internet]. 2023 Feb 16;15(4):3656. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3656
71. Mowar P, Gupta M, Jain M. Breaking the News Barrier: Towards Understanding News Consumption Practices among BVI Individuals in India. The 26th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility [Internet]. 2024 Oct 27;1–11. Available from: https://peyajm29.github.io/assets/documents/assets24f-sub5987-cam-i26.pdf
72. Acosta KR, Lara DIL. Systematic review of the influential aspects in digital entrepreneurship in the years 2019-2023. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Apr 6];5(5):431–9. Available from: https://www.allmultidisciplinaryjournal.com/uploads/archives/20240920201137_E-24-55.1.pdf
73. Kiarie J, Owusu E, Hagabirema G. The Role of Digital Marketing in Expanding Rural Markets in Sub-Saharan Africa. Aurora: Journal of Emerging Business Paradigms [Internet]. 2025;2(1):1–11. Available from: https://ejournal.sangadjimediapublishing.id/index.php/aurora/article/view/185
74. Ali, Md. Wasim Akhtar. The Influence of Digital Media on Consumer Behavior in Rural India. 2024 Mar 6 [cited 2024 Sep 14];128–39. Available from: t: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378831414
75. Kumar A, Joshi M, Gautam AK, Goldy Malviya. Impact of COVID-19 on International Trade and India’s response. ResearchGate [Internet]. 2023 Feb 15;106–14. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Atul-Kumar-135/publication/369038463_Impact_of_COVID-19_on_International_Trade_and_India
76. Syed, Agrawal S, Murtaza Q. Digital Supply Chain in Rural Markets with Special Reference to Indian Context: An Overview. Flexible systems management [Internet]. 2025 Jan 1 [cited 2025 Jul 20];305–19. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-96-3556-6_16
77. Mahesh A, Ganesh Bhat S. A Systematic Review and Research Agenda of Digital Payment System with reference to Unified Payment Interface. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) [Internet]. 2023 Jan 4 [cited 2024 Feb 20]; Available from: https://www.academia.edu/download/100478920/38._A_Systematic_Review_and_Research_Agenda_of_Digital_Payment.pdf
78. Kumar N, Abha K. Legal Aspects and Socio-Economic Impact of Internet Shutdowns in India. 2023 [cited 2025 Jul 20];1. Available from: https://research-communications.cmpcollege.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/20-Nitish-Kumar-Arya-Legel-aspects-of-Internet-shutdown-in-India_-Socio-Economic-Analysis.pdf
79. Arora SV, Krishna M, Dhir VL. Meesho: mission possible? Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies [Internet]. 2023 Jul 20;13(2):1–25. Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EEMCS-12-2022-0458/full/html
80. Sandeep Inampudi, Alok Kumar Gaurav. Transforming Institutions for Inclusive and Sustainable Governance: An Empirical Analysis of NITI Aayog’s Role in India. 2024 Jan 1;177–95. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-67616-1_10
81. Stebner S. Green growth: an exploratory study of metro and non-metro garden centers use of new-media marketing [Internet]. K-state.edu. 2015 [cited 2025 Jul 20]. Available from: https://krex.k-state.edu/items/470f262b-ac11-4d2e-aa6c-4e8971b213cb
82. Baj M, Rane Y, Shinde I. National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI): Overview of Innovations and Growth. Journal of Applied Management- Jidnyasa [Internet]. 2023 Dec 1;23–36. Available from: http://simsjam.net/index.php/Jidnyasa/article/view/173194
83. Tandon A. The Union Budget 2020-21: A Mixed Bag of Cheers and Tears. Journal of Business Thought [Internet]. 2017 Mar 4 [cited 2023 Mar 3];11(1):29–39. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fa08/8ab95d49db0c03597996dca09d7ed9830821.pdf
84. Bera S, Yao Y, Palit A, Rahut D. Edited by DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION FOR INCLUSIVE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN ASIA [Internet]. Available from: https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/938186/digital-transformation-inclusive-and-sustainable-development-asia-final-rev2.pdf#page=31
85. Rao KL, Rao N, Prasad D, Naik M, Sadhu G, Singh S, et al. Driving Economic Progress: The Impact of Digital India Initiative on India’s Growth Trajectory [Internet]. Available from: https://alochana.org/wp-content/uploads/27-AJ2460.pdf
86. Ghosh B. In Difference: The Vernacular Then and Now. South Asian Review [Internet]. 2020 Feb 21 [cited 2020 Jul 12];41(2):200–3. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02759527.2020.1725226
87. Gibson DG, Tamrat T, Mehl G. The State of Digital Interventions for Demand Generation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Considerations, Emerging Approaches, and Research Gaps. Global Health: Science and Practice [Internet]. 2018 Oct 10 [cited 2020 Feb 26];6(Supplement 1):S49–60. Available from: https://www.ghspjournal.org/content/6/Supplement_1/S49.short
88. Bose DL, Hundal A, Singh S, Singh S, Seth K, Hadi S ul, et al. Evidence and gap map report: Social and Behavior Change Communication (SBCC) interventions for strengthening HIV prevention and research among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). Campbell Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2023 Jan 10;19(1). Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/cl2.1297
89. Mehl G, Labrique A. Prioritizing integrated mHealth strategies for universal health coverage. Science [Internet]. 2014 Sep 11;345(6202):1284–7. Available from: https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1258926
90. Abdool Karim Q, Baxter C, Birx D. Prevention of HIV in Adolescent Girls and Young Women. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes [Internet]. 2017 May;75:S17–26. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/jaids/fulltext/2017/05011/prevention_of_hiv_in_adolescent_girls_and_young.4.aspx
91. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Science [Internet]. 2011;6(42). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-42
92. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and Processes of self-change of smoking: toward an Integrative Model of change. [Internet]. psycnet.apa.org. 1983. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1983-26480-001
93. World Health Organization. WHO Classification of Digital Health Interventions v1.0 [Internet]. Policycommons.net. >; 2018 [cited 2025 Jul 20]. Available from: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/543001/classification-of-digital-health-interventions-v10/1520036/
94. Melo LP de, Cortez LC de A, Santos R de P. Is the chronicity of HIV/AIDS fragile? Biomedicine, politics and sociability in an online social network. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem [Internet]. 2020;28. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/rlae/a/ZrWvpCZDmD5WJNyNYvJkRZG/?lang=en
95. Kumar P, Aridoss S, Mathiyazhakan M, Dhanusu S, Das C, Rajan S, et al. Integrated Behavioral and Biological Surveillance Among People Living With HIV Visiting the Antiretroviral Therapy Centers in India: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Surveillance. JMIR Research Protocols [Internet]. 2025 May 21 [cited 2025 Jul 20];14:e58252. Available from: https://www.researchprotocols.org/2025/1/e58252
96. Kebede Y, Abebe L, Alemayehu G, Sudhakar M, Birhanu Z. School-based social and behavior change communication (SBCC) advances community exposure to malaria messages, acceptance, and preventive practices in Ethiopia: A pre-posttest study. Samy AM, editor. PLOS ONE [Internet]. 2020 Jun 25;15(6):e0235189. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0235189