The use of technology in education has profoundly transformed conventional teaching techniques, promoted creativity and enhanced student participation.  Recent discoveries indicate that generative artificial intelligence (AI) has become a transformational force with the potential to revolutionize higher education lectures.  Generative AI offers chances to meet the evolving demands of contemporary educational institutions by producing high-quality material, enabling personalised learning experiences, and improving classroom interactions. 

Generative AI systems employ deep learning models to produce text, graphics, and interactive simulations, equipping educators with effective tools to enhance lesson design, optimise content delivery, and engage students in immersive learning experiences.  AI-powered content creation technologies may provide lecture materials, quizzes, and visual aids customised for various learning styles.  These innovations allow instructors to allocate more time to individualised student assistance while maintaining consistent, high-quality teaching material.  Furthermore, AI-driven adaptive learning systems have become increasingly prevalent in higher education.  These systems evaluate individual student progress, learning preferences, and performance statistics to customise course contents and instructional approaches accordingly. 

Adaptive learning systems improve understanding and retention by recognising knowledge gaps and tailoring information delivery, particularly in intricate subjects. 

This degree of customisation enables students to progress at their own speed, enhancing overall academic performance. Owoseni et al. (2024) analyse the impact of AI-driven technologies on pedagogical approaches, content dissemination, and evaluation methods. 

The book highlights the capacity of generative AI to improve personalised learning experiences, automate administrative functions, and promote student engagement.  The writers address obstacles like data privacy issues, ethical conflicts, and the necessity for digital preparedness among educators and institutions. 

The book delivers practical insights and case examples, serving as a thorough guide for academic stakeholders to properly utilise AI tools, hence fostering creativity and enhancing educational outcomes.

Chart: 01

Theoretical Background

The research builds its theoretical framework by employing recognized frameworks which demonstrate how essential technology is in educational environments.  Fundamental ideas such the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT), and Constructivist Learning Theory underpin the comprehension of generative AI's impact on higher education teaching.

 TAM demonstrates how the adoption likelihood depends on two key variables which are identified as perceived ease of use and perceived utility.  Faculty members show different levels of generative AI technology adoption behavior based on their belief that the systems are capable of improving education delivery methods and educational content and student interaction.

IDT establishes concepts about innovation distribution combined with user acceptance behavior through well-defined time periods.  An innovation requires five core conditions for adoption based on relative advantage alongside compatibility and complexity in addition to trialability and observability.  The implementation of AI systems showing advantages for content generation together with adaptive learning methods and improved engagement solutions demonstrates the best potential to be taken up in higher education teaching.

During active learning the Constructivist Learning Theory promotes three fundamental elements: interaction followed by cooperation which leads to critical analysis.  AI educational approaches that generate content enable students to become more engaged in their learning because the technology produces customized educational routes and adaptive content.  The research unites theoretical models to explain how benefits shape educational outcomes within higher education after validating investments and instructor preparation levels.

Chart: 02

Labib and ElSabry (2025) emphasize the significance of AI in adaptive learning, intelligent tutoring systems, and data-informed decision-making within higher education institutions.  The authors underscore the necessity of synchronizing AI implementation with institutional objectives while tackling concerns about digital fairness, ethical implications, and faculty development.  This chapter outlines techniques for incorporating AI technologies into teaching, research, and administrative systems to foster a more adaptive and efficient learning environment.  The authors promote a collaborative strategy that harmonizes technology progress with educational principles, based on an analysis of successful AI implementation scenarios. Nikolopoulou (2024) emphasised the capacity of AI technologies to aid educators in crafting engaging classes, promoting personalised learning experiences, and enhancing student engagement.

It underscores the capacity of Chat GPT to facilitate knowledge production, critical thinking, and collaborative learning.  The author discusses the obstacles to AI adoption, including ethical issues and the necessity for digital literacy among educators.  Malița and Grosseck examine the transformative impact of generative AI on higher education, particularly in the realms of pedagogical approaches and educational experiences.  The presentation given at the Romanian International Conference for Education and Research highlights AI's function in automating administrative duties, creating personalised learning trajectories, and improving teacher-student engagement.  The authors underscore the need of faculty training and institutional support to optimise the effective use of AI in educational environments. Baskar (2024) contends that generative AI may enhance dynamic content generation, adaptive feedback mechanisms, and individualised learning trajectories, therefore empowering students and educators alike.  The research underscores the need of amalgamating AI technologies with collaborative platforms to develop interactive learning settings that promote critical thinking and problem-solving skills.  Furthermore, the author emphasises the necessity for institutions to provide resources towards digital infrastructure and faculty development initiatives to facilitate effective implementation.  The article advocates for AI-facilitated collaboration, envisioning a future in which colleges cultivate creativity, innovation, and communal advancement inside learning communities.

Hashmi and Bal (2024) analyze the impact of AI tools such as Chat GPT on pedagogical methods, content generation, and student involvement.  The authors emphasize the capability of generative AI to provide individualized learning trajectories, automate assessment processes, and improve academic support services.  They also tackle issues related to academic integrity, data security, and the potential for excessive dependence on AI tools.  The study underscores the necessity for universities to establish explicit norms, ethical frameworks, and faculty development initiatives to properly leverage AI's promise while preserving academic integrity. Villegas-Ch et al. (2020) delineates a concept wherein chat bots offer immediate academic assistance, furnish tailored learning materials, and enhance interactions between students and professors.  The suggested system utilizes natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning to enhance information distribution, student engagement, and administrative efficiency.  The writers underscore the chat bot function in advancing sustainability through the optimization of resource management and the reduction of operational expenses.  The study anticipates that the integration of AI chat bots into intelligent campus settings would lead to improved student support systems and enhanced educational results.

Although generative AI is swiftly revolutionizing several industries, its use in higher education teaching is yet inadequately examined.  Current research mostly highlights AI's use in automating administrative duties, creating intelligent teaching systems, or improving personalised education.  Nonetheless, the capacity of generative AI as a direct instrument for transforming lecture delivery, content development, and student engagement remains to be thoroughly explored.  Research has investigated AI-based learning platforms; nevertheless, the incorporation of generative AI into educational frameworks for engaging and immersive instruction is not substantiated by empirical data.  Moreover, little research examines the cognitive and behavioral effects of generative AI-enhanced lectures on students' understanding, critical thinking, and long-term retention.  Although several studies emphasise the advantages of AI in enhancing engagement via personalised material delivery, they frequently overlook the wider ramifications for academic success, the alleviation of educator workload, and curriculum development.  There exists a deficiency in comprehension on how generative AI might meet varied learning requirements in multicultural and multilingual classrooms, particularly in developing economies.  A significant deficiency exists in the ethical issues of the application of generative AI in teaching.  Concerns around content authenticity, data privacy, and potential bias in AI-generated material necessitate comprehensive examination.  Although adaptive learning platforms and AI-generated exams are becoming increasingly popular, their conformity to recognised pedagogical frameworks and academic standards remains in progress.  Furthermore, there is a paucity of studies about faculty preparedness, training requirements, and resistance to the use of generative AI in lecture presentation.  Research is necessary to evaluate educators' perceived obstacles, technical difficulties, and the institutional assistance needed for the effective use of this transformational technology.  Rectifying these deficiencies can realize the whole potential of generative AI, guaranteeing its incorporation improves educational results without undermining academic integrity.

Importance of Study

The study is essential since it examines a crucial convergence between technology and education.  Generative AI has the capacity to transform higher education lectures by facilitating personalised, adaptable, and immersive learning experiences.  This study examines the use of generative AI in lecture delivery, offering significant insights for educators, administrators, and policymakers aiming to modernize educational processes.  The study's findings can enhance instructional quality by allowing lecturers to provide dynamic content suited to various learning preferences.  Generative AI may automate the production of lecture notes, visual aids, and assessment materials, enabling instructors to concentrate more on guiding conversations and catering to specific student requirements.  This innovation is especially crucial in expansive classroom environments where individualized attention is frequently difficult to achieve.  From a student's viewpoint, generative AI may augment engagement by creating interactive and immersive information tailored to various learning styles.  The study can demonstrate the efficacy of AI-enhanced learning experiences by examining their influence on students' cognitive capacities, critical thinking, and overall academic achievement.  This study provides insights into how generative AI might tackle issues in multilingual and multicultural classrooms through real-time language translation, content adaption, and personalised coaching.  Such developments can enhance inclusion and close educational disparities across varied student populations.  This research can assist institutional decision-makers in formulating strategies for faculty training, infrastructure investment, and curriculum restructuring to facilitate the incorporation of generative AI.  The study can reveal essential facilitators and obstacles to adoption by analyzing educators' attitudes, technological preparedness, and perceived problems.  This study seeks to establish a paradigm for the ethical and successful integration of generative AI into higher education lectures, ensuring that innovation is consistent with pedagogical best practices.  The insights acquired will enable educational institutions to use generative AI's capabilities, cultivating an enhanced and future-oriented learning environment.

Articulation of the Issue

The fast progression of generative AI technology offers substantial prospects for revolutionising higher education instruction.  Although several AI technologies have showcased their capabilities in content production, personalised learning, and administrative automation, their use in lecture delivery is still inadequately investigated.  Higher education institutions have difficulties in incorporating generative AI into conventional instructional frameworks owing to apprehensions over academic rigour, ethical implications, and educator readiness.  As a result, there is little empirical data about the efficacy of generative AI in enhancing lecture delivery, augmenting student engagement, and accommodating varied learning requirements.  A significant issue is the preparedness of instructors to use this technology.  A significant number of lecturers lack the technical proficiency necessary for the proper implementation of AI-driven solutions, potentially leading to uneven acceptance or opposition to change.  Moreover, there exists uncertainty over the possible effects of generative AI on educational results, especially in improving comprehension, critical thinking, and knowledge retention.  The lack of standardized frameworks for using generative AI into higher education teaching exacerbates its acceptance challenges.  Although certain educators may explore AI technologies for content creation, the optimal pedagogical techniques for integrating these tools with conventional teaching methods remain ambiguous.  Moreover, ethical issues, including intellectual property rights, hazards of disinformation, and possible biases in AI-generated material, require additional scrutiny to guarantee responsible use. 

Objectives:

The present study aims to investigate the perceptions of educators and students toward AI-driven innovations in higher education lecturing. By analyzing influential factors such as AI-powered content creation, adaptive learning systems, and faculty training, this research offers insights into optimizing AI integration strategies. The findings will help institutions design effective policies that balance innovation, security, and accessibility, ultimately transforming the future of higher education lecturing.

1. To examine the key factors influencing the integration of generative AI in higher education lecturing.
2. To analyze stakeholder perceptions of AI-driven innovations in teaching methodologies.
3. To identify demographic influences on attitudes toward generative AI adoption.
4. To provide recommendations for institutions to effectively implement AI-enhanced learning systems.

The study aims to examine how generative AI might transform higher education lectures, while also identifying possible dangers, obstacles, and facilitators.  The study will investigate the ramifications for student learning experiences, instructor responsibilities, and institutional initiatives for AI integration.  This project seeks to establish a complete framework for incorporating generative AI into lecture delivery, therefore facilitating evidence-based tactics that harmonise technology innovation with effective teaching.

Table 1: Descriptive Statistics Perception towards AI to Revolutionize Higher Education Lecturing

The data highlights key factors influencing the integration of generative AI in higher education lecturing, evaluated through their Mean, Standard Deviation, and Mean Rank values.

1. AI-Powered Content Creation has the highest mean score (4.48) and the highest mean rank (4.74), indicating strong agreement among respondents about its significance. This suggests that AI's ability to generate lecture materials, presentations, and assessments is seen as the most impactful factor in revolutionizing lecture delivery.
2. Interactive Learning Environments follows closely with a mean of 4.23 and a mean rank of 4.32, reflecting its perceived value in engaging students through immersive content, simulations, and interactive activities.
3. Faculty Training & Support and Learning Styles & Preferences both have a mean of 4.13 and similar mean ranks (3.98 and 3.99 respectively). This indicates that respondents view faculty readiness and adapting AI tools to diverse learning needs as equally important for effective AI integration.
4. Data Privacy has a mean of 4.01 and a mean rank of 3.70, showing moderate concern regarding privacy risks. While recognized as important, it appears less critical compared to other factors.
5. Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Adaptive Learning Systems scored lower in comparison, with means of 3.99 and 3.93 and mean ranks of 3.69 and 3.58 respectively. Although these technologies are valued, respondents may perceive them as supplementary or still developing in educational contexts.

Key Insights:

• AI-Powered Content Creation is seen as the most impactful factor, likely due to its immediate benefits in improving lecture efficiency and quality.
• Interactive Learning Environments ranks highly, reflecting the growing demand for engaging and dynamic teaching methods.
• Faculty Training & Support and Learning Styles & Preferences are seen as essential enablers for ensuring AI adoption is effective and inclusive.
• While Data Privacy remains a concern, it is not viewed as the most pressing factor in this context.
• Lower rankings for NLP and Adaptive Learning Systems suggest these tools may still require further development or greater awareness among educators.

These insights indicate that effective AI adoption in higher education will require a strong focus on content creation tools, faculty readiness, and interactive learning enhancements while addressing privacy concerns and maximizing emerging AI capabilities like NLP.

Table 2: Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance

The results of Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance analysis reveal insights into the level of agreement among respondents regarding the ranking of factors influencing generative AI adoption in higher education lecturing. With a sample size of 150, the calculated Kendall’s value is 0.019, indicating very weak agreement among participants. Since W ranges between 0 (no agreement) and 1 (perfect agreement), this low value suggests considerable variability in respondents' perceptions. Despite the weak agreement, the Chi-Square value of 12.321 with 6 degrees of freedom (df) yields a statistically significant p-value (Asymp. Sig. = 0.015), which is below the 0.05 threshold. This significance indicates that the observed differences in rankings are unlikely to be due to random chance. The findings suggest that stakeholders hold diverse views on the relative importance of AI-related factors in lecture delivery, emphasizing the need for customized implementation strategies that address varying institutional priorities and educator preferences.

Personal Factors of the Respondents

Gender may significantly influence perceptions and adoption of generative AI in higher education lecturing. Male and female educators may differ in their attitudes, technological readiness, and comfort levels with AI integration. Research suggests that men may exhibit higher confidence in adopting emerging technologies, while women may prioritize ethical considerations, data privacy, and student well-being when leveraging AI tools. Addressing these differences is crucial for promoting inclusive AI adoption strategies. By providing gender-sensitive training programs, mentorship opportunities, and supportive learning environments, institutions can empower educators of all genders to effectively harness generative AI for enhancing lecture delivery and student engagement.

Age groups can significantly impact the adoption of generative AI in higher education lecturing. Younger educators, often digital natives, may show greater enthusiasm and adaptability toward AI-driven tools, embracing interactive learning environments and AI-generated content with ease. Conversely, older educators may face challenges due to limited exposure to advanced technologies, potentially requiring additional training and support. However, experienced faculty may excel in integrating AI with traditional pedagogical methods, leveraging their subject expertise to enhance content quality. Tailored training programs that address age-specific learning needs can bridge this gap, ensuring educators across all age groups effectively adopt generative AI in lecturing.

Income levels can influence the adoption of generative AI in higher education lecturing, particularly in terms of access to resources, training, and technological tools. Educators with higher incomes may have greater access to advanced devices, premium AI software, and specialized training programs, enabling them to experiment with and implement AI-driven teaching strategies more effectively. Conversely, educators with lower incomes may face financial constraints that limit their ability to invest in AI tools or professional development. Institutions can address this gap by providing subsidized training, grants, and institutional resources to ensure equitable access to AI technologies, fostering inclusive adoption across income groups.

Table 3: Personal Factors

Gender: Females (Mean = 61.46, SD = 18.61) reported slightly higher scores than Males (Mean = 60.02, SD = 17.09). The Z-value of 0.781 and p-value of 0.326 indicate no significant difference between male and female respondents. This suggests that gender does not substantially influence perceptions of AI’s impact on higher education lecturing.

Age Group: Young respondents reported the highest mean score (63.78) with a moderate standard deviation (17.41), indicating greater positivity or awareness towards AI adoption. Middle-aged respondents (Mean = 61.87) and Older respondents (Mean = 62.76) showed slightly lower yet comparable mean scores. The F-value of 4.259 and p-value of 0.007 indicate a statistically significant difference between age groups. This suggests that younger individuals may have a more favorable perception of AI integration in higher education.

Income Group: The Low-income group had the highest mean score (63.81) followed by the Middle-income group (61.86) and the High-income group (60.78). The F-value of 0.288 and p-value of 0.626 indicate no significant difference between income groups, suggesting that economic status does not strongly influence perceptions of AI in lecturing. The overall mean score for the sample is 67.86 with a standard deviation of 19.17, suggesting moderate variability in responses.

Natural language processing (NLP) enhances the capabilities of AI in education by facilitating intelligent chatbots and virtual teaching assistants.  These technologies provide immediate assistance, elucidate uncertainties, and enhance student-faculty engagement outside conventional classroom environments.  NLP applications substantially enhance the learning experience by promoting ongoing involvement.  Successful AI integration in higher education necessitates extensive faculty training and institutional backing.  Faculty members must cultivate technological proficiencies to utilise AI-driven technologies successfully.  Moreover, safeguarding data privacy and confronting ethical issues are essential in the use of AI.  Institutions must establish comprehensive procedures to safeguard student information and maintain educational integrity. Chaer (2024) underscores the capacity of AI-driven solutions to augment human intellect through improved decision-making, material dissemination, and tailored learning experiences.  The research emphasized the function of AI in automating monotonous academic duties, enhancing administrative efficiency, and enabling data-driven insights for institutional advancement.  The research emphasizes the necessity for institutions to implement proactive methods for AI integration, encompassing faculty training, ethical frameworks, and revised curriculum.  By integrating AI technology with conventional pedagogical approaches, the author anticipate a future in which educators are enabled to develop engaging, student-centered learning environments that address various requirements.  The chapter emphasises the significance of international cooperation to promote AI-driven breakthroughs in higher education.

Implications for the Study

This study has significant implications for educational institutions, policymakers, educators, and students. By investigating the integration of generative AI in higher education lecturing, the research will contribute valuable insights into improving teaching methodologies, enhancing student engagement, and promoting personalized learning experiences. For educators, the study can provide practical guidance on leveraging generative AI tools to enhance lecture preparation, content delivery, and assessment design. By automating routine tasks such as generating lecture slides, visual aids, and quizzes, lecturers can dedicate more time to mentoring students and facilitating interactive discussions. Moreover, the study’s findings can inform strategies to enhance faculty readiness, addressing skill gaps and promoting positive attitudes toward AI adoption. From an institutional perspective, this research can assist universities in developing comprehensive AI integration strategies. The study will highlight key infrastructure requirements, training needs, and policy considerations to ensure effective and ethical deployment of generative AI tools. It can also guide institutions in developing frameworks for evaluating the credibility, accuracy, and security of AI-generated content. For students, the study’s outcomes may reveal how generative AI can create immersive, adaptive learning environments that cater to diverse learning styles. Personalized content generation, interactive simulations, and multilingual support can improve accessibility, especially for students in marginalized or underrepresented groups. Policymakers can leverage the findings to establish regulatory frameworks that ensure the responsible use of generative AI in education. This includes guidelines for academic integrity, content authenticity, and data privacy to mitigate risks associated with AI-generated misinformation or bias.

Recommendations and Suggestions

Based on the findings of this study, several key recommendations and suggestions can support the effective integration of generative AI in higher education lecturing:

1. Faculty Training and Development: Universities should implement structured training programs to equip educators with the necessary skills to utilize generative AI tools effectively. Training should include technical guidance, ethical considerations, and pedagogical strategies to integrate AI content seamlessly into lecture delivery.
2. AI-Enhanced Curriculum Design: Institutions should encourage faculty to integrate generative AI into course design, creating interactive content, automated feedback systems, and personalized learning pathways. This approach can support diverse learning needs and improve student engagement.
3. Ethical Guidelines for AI Usage: Universities should establish clear policies to address concerns related to content authenticity, plagiarism, and intellectual property. Ethical guidelines should promote responsible AI use, ensuring that AI-generated materials uphold academic integrity.
4. Infrastructure Investment: Educational institutions must invest in AI-ready infrastructure to support seamless integration. This includes enhancing digital platforms, upgrading classroom technology, and ensuring robust data security measures to protect student information.
5. Promoting Collaborative Learning: Universities should explore collaborative AI tools that enable students to actively participate in content creation, discussions, and peer feedback. Such tools can foster critical thinking and teamwork in AI-driven learning environments.
6. Continuous Evaluation and Feedback: Institutions should implement ongoing evaluation mechanisms to assess the impact of generative AI on student outcomes, lecturer efficiency, and overall educational quality. Feedback from educators and students will be essential in refining AI integration strategies.

The integration of generative AI into higher education lecturing holds transformative potential, yet its implementation requires careful consideration of pedagogical, ethical, and institutional factors. This study highlights the existing gaps in research, emphasizing the need for comprehensive frameworks that guide AI adoption in educational settings. By addressing these gaps, educational institutions can unlock AI’s potential to revolutionize lecture delivery, enhance student engagement, and improve learning outcomes. Generative AI offers unprecedented opportunities for creating personalized, adaptive, and interactive learning environments. For educators, AI-driven tools can streamline lecture preparation, automate assessments, and facilitate content generation tailored to students’ learning preferences. These innovations can alleviate administrative burdens, enabling educators to focus on enhancing student-teacher interactions and fostering critical thinking skills. However, successful AI integration requires universities to prioritize faculty training, infrastructure readiness, and ethical considerations. Developing robust frameworks that guide educators on effective AI usage will ensure that technology complements — rather than replaces — human teaching expertise. Additionally, institutions must address concerns about content authenticity, intellectual property, and data privacy to mitigate potential risks. The study’s recommendations emphasize the importance of collaboration among educators, policymakers, and technology developers to create responsible AI-driven learning ecosystems. Investing in continuous evaluation mechanisms will enable institutions to refine their strategies based on student feedback, ensuring that AI adoption aligns with evolving educational needs. Ultimately, by harnessing generative AI’s capabilities responsibly, higher education institutions can foster innovative, inclusive, and effective learning environments. This approach not only enhances academic performance but also prepares students for success in an increasingly digital world. As generative AI continues to evolve, its strategic integration in higher education lecturing can redefine traditional teaching paradigms, empowering both educators and learners to thrive in the AI-driven educational landscape.

1. Nikolopoulou, K. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Exploring ways of harnessing pedagogical practices with the assistance of ChatGPT. International Journal of Changes in Education, 1(2), 103-111.
2. Malița, L., & Grosseck, G. Transforming Higher Education: How Generative AI Might Revolutionize Learning and Teaching. In Romanian International Conference for Education and Research (p. 157).
3. Al-Chaer, E. D. (2024). Intelligence Amplified: Exploring the Future of Higher Education in the AI Age. In Higher Education in the Arab World: Digital Transformation (pp. 13-35). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
4. Baskara, R. (2024). From AI to we: Harnessing generative AI tools to cultivate collaborative learning ecosystems in universities. In Proceeding International Conference on Learning Community (ICLC) (Vol. 1, No. 1).
5. Owoseni, A., Kolade, O., & Egbetokun, A. (2024). Generative AI in Higher Education. Springer Books.
6. Labib, L. N., & ElSabry, E. A. (2025). Integrating AI into Higher Education: A Comprehensive Exploration. In Interdisciplinary Studies on Digital Transformation and Innovation: Business, Education, and Medical Approaches(pp. 1-30). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
7. Hashmi, N., & Bal, A. S. (2024). Generative AI in higher education and beyond. Business Horizons, 67(5), 607-614.
8. Villegas-Ch, W.; Arias-Navarrete, A.; Palacios-Pacheco, X. Proposal of an Architecture for the Integration of a Chatbot with Artificial Intelligence in a Smart Campus for the Improvement of Learning. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1500.
9. Lee, D.; Yeo, S. Developing an AI-based chatbot for practicing responsive teaching in mathematics. Comput. Educ. 2022, 191, 104646.
10. Klimova, B.; Seraj, P.M.I. The use of chatbots in university EFL settings: Research trends and pedagogical implications. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1146.
11. Lin, C.J.; Mubarok, H. Learning analytics for investigating the mind map-guided AI chatbot approach in an EFL flipped speaking classroom. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2021, 24, 16–35.
12. Nwana, H.S. Intelligent tutoring systems: An overview. Artif. Intell. Rev. 1990, 4, 251–277.
13. Bhutoria, A. Personalized education and artificial intelligence in United States, China, and India: A systematic Review using a Human-In-The-Loop model. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 2022, 3, 100068.
14. Hao, K. China has started a grand experiment in AI education. It could reshape how the world learns. MIT Technol. Rev. 2019, 123
15. Clarke, V.; Braun, V.; Hayfield, N. Thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. Qual. Psychol. 2015, 3, 222–248.
16. Popkhadze, N. The Good, The Bad and The Ugly: AI in the higher education. Hallinnon Tutk. 2021, 40, 254–263.
17. Google Trends. Google Trends. Available online: https://www.google.com/trends (accessed on 25 April 2023).
18. Luan, H.; Tsai, C.C. A review of using machine learning approaches for precision education. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2021, 24, 250–266.
19. Jonnalagadda, A.; Rajvir, M.; Singh, S.; Chandramouliswaran, S.; George, J.; Kamalov, F. An Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Model for Emotion and Mental Health Detection. J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. 2023, 22, 2250075.
20. Mahfood, B.; Elnagar, A.; Kamalov, F. Emotion Recognition from Speech Using Convolutional Neural Networks. In Proceedings of the Data Analytics and Management: ICDAM 2022; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 719–731.