A drastic change is observed in numbers of industries including business, education, tourism, and sustainability due to fast development in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI). In the tech-driven age, its transformative capacity has become vital to the growth and rethinking of industries and processes. The urge to comprehend AI's complex effects has grown more pressing as economies and communities all over the world negotiate the advantages and threats it presents. Currently, AI technologies are essential to an enterprise management and strategic decision-making processes, driving productivity and innovation in a range of industries (Agarwal et al., 2024). AI has been particularly essential in refining smart city performance, bringing transformation in the field of education, advancing environmental resilience and boosting eco-friendly travel.

AI's support to the growth of smart cities shows how vital it is to building connected, more ecological, livable, and efficient urban settings. Smarter resolutions for waste reduction, energy efficiency, traffic management, and public health monitoring have occurred as an effect of the integration of AI in the administration of municipal infrastructure and services (de Bem Machado et al., 2024). As these technologies progress, smart cities hope to use AI to understand their objective of refining the prosperity and level of affluence for their citizens. Even so, there are shortcomings to the wide usage of A.I in this field, many issues with data privacy, ethics and data security (Olaleye et al., 2023). These issues shows how important it is to use AI in urban settings in a accountable and open manner.

Applications of AI in business and sustainability include green human resource management (GHRM) techniques and sustainable tourism. AI is transforming how companies utilize resources, reduce carbon emissions, and upkeep more general sustainability objectives (Dawra et al., 2024). Since AI-based solutions help enhance energy consumption, improve tourist experiences, and indorse eco-friendly behaviours, the hotel and tourism industries are also exploring the new potential of AI in handling sustainability concerns (Basu, 2024). In order to promote sustainability and guarantee the tourism industry's resilience in the face of worldwide climate change, Artificial Intelligence's (AI) capacity to predict and adjust to future demands is essential (Mattiello et al., 2024).

The usage of Artificial Intelligence in the education field has become a strong instrument for disrupting well-known traditional performance assessment frameworks. Up-to-date, data-driven insights into student performance are made possible by Artificial Intelligence, which enhances outcomes in a variety of educational settings and allows more personalized learning experiences (Halagatti et al., 2023). A livelier and interactive learning environment might be supported by AI technology, which could also improve management education (Cook & Cook, 2024). However, concerns with accessibility, data ethics and the digital divide are raised by the growing usage of AI in education field.

A broad canvas for realizing AI's radical potential is provided by the study of its effects on economies, society, and human lives. The aim of this study is to assemble the most recent viewpoints on how AI is influencing economies, improving sustainability, and transforming many segments and industries. Policymakers, Business leaders, corporate executives, and educators can well negotiate the challenges of AI adoption by using these insights, guaranteeing that AI will favourably influence the growth of economies and societies in the age of technology (Jonathan et al., 2024; Jiang & Jiang, 2024).

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a transformative force that is reshaping businesses, labour markets, and social conventions. Also, discussing the broader societal and ethical concerns of accepting AI and its integration, the previous studies examine different perspectives on the technology's function in industries like tourism, healthcare, human resources, education, tourism and sustainability.

Rahman et al. (2024) studied the intersection of AI and regenerative tourism, underlining that AI can benefit in predicting and overseeing tourist movement, reduce environmental effects, and ensure a sustainable experience for visitors. This relates with the growing worldwide focus on sustainable tourism practices, where AI helps in optimizing efficiency in resource management, reduction in generation of waste, and promotion of ecological destinations (Rahman et al., 2024).

Morgan and Cogan (2024) underline the potential of AI to create machine learning algorithms co-created with key stakeholders to tackle mental health differences. AI implementation to examine patient records and deliver custom-made care options can make health services more equitable and accessible, mainly in areas where resources are limited.

Mer and Virdi (2023) studied the influence of AI on HRM practices in a post-pandemic environment, recruitment, highlighting performance evaluations, and planning of workforce. Implentation of AI-enabled tools has improved the recruitment process. Nevertheless, as noted by Vishwakarma and Singh (2023), the application of AI in HR faces several challenges that will continue to pose major issue to the complete incorporation of AI in HRM practices. A complete policy framework can determine the ethical installation of AI systems in the workplace to handle the challenges.

Bag and Pretorius (2022) suggest a research framework to understand the links between Industry 4.0, the circular economy, and sustainable manufacturing. They note that AI can improve production processes, manage waste, and reduce carbon footprints, leading to more eco-friendly manufacturing methods. Zu (2023) highlights the role of AI in promoting sustainable growth and stresses the importance of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global sustainability efforts.

Roumell and Roessger (2019) explores how data analytics and AI-powered solutions can assist in the development of more adaptive and smart policies in educating workforce, providing viewpoints on how these technologies can solve skill shortages and enhance lifelong learning chances. Ahmad (2020) underlines the significance of preparing students for future employment by integrating AI and other developing technologies into higher education.

Wright and Zascerinska (2023) studied the developing segments of wellness and medical tourism, where AI technologies aim to personalize health services and enhance the overall customer experience.

Costa et al. (2022) observe how the Fifth Industrial Revolution affects global civil society, claiming that the swift incorporation of AI into daily life considerably influences ethical standards, social frameworks, and human values. Fuchs (2022) analyzes policy discussions related to AI and robotics, focusing on the Unites States, China, and European Union highlighting the different regulatory strategies for Artificial Intelligence implementation.

Mukherjee (2022) explores the challenges of integrating Artificial Intelligence into labor-intensive economies, particularly during pandemic recovery. While AI can enhance efficiency and productivity, its adoption in industries heavily reliant on human labor, such as manufacturing, raises concerns about job displacement and inequality.

Rajguru (2024) examines the impact of AI on value creation in business, highlighting its role in improving customer experiences, boosting operational efficiency, and driving innovation.

Dahms (2021) looks at how AI impacts the future of work, focusing on wellness and human potential. He also critiques the broader societal effects of technology on human well-being.

The existing research shows that Artificial Intelligence can bring sustainable development, improve tourism practices, boost healthcare systems and rebuild human resource management. In order to attain these above benefits, stakeholders need to address concerns related to bias, equity, and governance. The future of AI is determined based on its ability to balance innovation with responsibility, guaranteeing that its transformative potential is utilized for the collective good. Studies have explored, AI’s influence on solving social issues, enhancing public services, and transforming industries is unquestionable.

RQ: How does the adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) impact efficiency, sustainability, and innovation in key segments like education, smart cities, and tourism?

In total, 174 samples were randomly chosen from enterprises and segments using AI technologies. The research methodolody involves a quantitative approach of research. This approach was used to study the factors affecting the Efficiency of AI Adoption (EAA), focused on AI Infrastructure Readiness (AIR) and the Adoption of AI in Decision-Making (AIDM). Information was collected by means of a structured questionnaire. The designed questionnaire employs a 5-point Likert scale to assess the participants’ views on AIR, AIDM, and EAA. The scale extended from 1 which implies (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), which will allow respondents to specify their level of agreement with diverse statements regarding A.I adoption infrastructure, practices and decision-making. The sampling technique required to guarantee diversity regarding industry types and sizes, present a varied representation of Artificial Intelligence implementation practices.

Objectives:

1. To assess the role of AI in fostering sustainability across segments such as smart cities, tourism, and education.
2. To explore the effect of AI-driven solutions on operational efficiency and innovation in key economic and social segments.

Hypotheses:

H₁: The integration of AI technologies significantly enhances sustainability outcomes in urban management, tourism, and educational segments.

H₂: AI adoption measurably enhances operational efficiency and resource optimization in smart cities, education, and tourism.

Regression Model:

Efficiency of AI Adoption (EAA) = β0 ​+ β1 ​AI Infrastructure Readiness (AIR) + β2

Adoption of AI in Decision-Making (AIDM) + ϵ

The collected data were examined using R Studio, a powerful statistical software tool. Precisely, regression analysis was used to measure the relationship between the dependent variable (EAA) and the independent variables (AIR and AIDM). The regression model aims to identify the strength and prominence of these relationships, providing insights into the factors that add most to the efficiency of AI adoption. The result of the regression analysis was used to derive conclusions on the role of infrastructure readiness and decision-making in enhancing the adoption of AI technologies across diverse enterprises. The methodology confirms that the results are robust, reliable, and generalizable within the framework of the study, providing actionable references for upcoming AI adoption strategies.

The demographic analysis of the 174 samples displays diverse traits across different groups. About gender, the sample comprises 60% males and 40% females, showing a fairly balanced depiction of each gender. The age breakdown indicates that 25% of participants are aged 18-25, 35% are 26-35 years old, 20% belong to the 36-45 age range, and the final 20% are over 45 years, showcasing a diverse assortment of ages participating in AI adoption. Concerning educational qualifications, 10% of participants possess a high school diploma, 30% have finished their undergraduate studies, 45% hold advanced degrees, and 15% have earned doctoral degrees, demonstrating a well-educated group.

Regarding their occupations, 40% of participants are working professionals, 30% hold managerial roles, 20% are executives or technical workers, and 10% are self-employed or business owners. This illustrates a wide range of job positions, emphasizing the varied personnel engaged in AI-related decision-making activities. Ultimately, income distribution shows that 20% of the participants earn less than Rs. 3,00,000 per year, 40% make between Rs. 3,00,000 and Rs. 6,00,000, 30% receive earnings ranging from Rs. 6,00,000 and                      Rs. 9,00,000, and 10% make over Rs. 9,00,000. This income bracket indicates a representation of the middle to upper-middle class, highlighting the economic variety among those engaged in AI adoption and its effects.

Sources: R Studio Analysis]

The regression analysis investigates the connection between Efficiency of AI Adoption (EAA) as the dependent variable and AI Infrastructure Readiness (AIR) and Adoption of AI in Decision-Making (AIDM) as independent variables. The R-squared value of the model, 0.6791, shows that around 68% of the variation in EAA is accounted for by AIR and AIDM, demonstrating significant explanatory strength. The modified R-squared value of 0.6753 further confirms the model by considering the number of predictors.

The coefficient for AIR (0.60329, p < 0.001) indicates a notable and positive impact, implying that advancements in AI infrastructure readiness greatly improve EAA. Likewise, the coefficient for AIDM (0.30851, p < 0.001) signifies a positive and significant effect, highlighting its role in enhancing efficiency. The residual standard error of 0.5312 indicates strong model accuracy, and the overall model is highly significant (F = 178.8, p < 2.2e-16), validating the high predictive relevance of the independent variables.

Figure 1: Q – Q Plot

The Q-Q plot shows the distribution of residuals from the regression model in comparison to a theoretical normal distribution. In the graph, the residuals closely follow the reference line, suggesting that they are roughly normally distributed. This normality is vital for confirming the assumptions of linear regression, guaranteeing the model's trustworthiness for prediction and inference. Little deviations at the extremes (tails) signifies possible minor outliers but do not particularly effect the model's entire validity. The rightness of the model in justifying the relationship between the dependent and independent variables rely on how well the points align with the reference line.

In summary, conducting the regression analysis has shown a strong, positive relationship between following variables the Efficiencey of AI (EAA) with AI Infrastructure Readiness (AIR) and Adoption of AI in Decision-Making (AIDM). The model’s findings, with an R-squared value of 0.6791, substantiate that AIR and AIDM substantially contribute to the efficiency of AI adoption. This has also helped in positioning them as key determinants for enterprises who wish to utilize AI technologies. The significant coefficients and the goodness of fit underscore the importance of both infrastructure readiness and decision-making integration in facilitating successful AI implementation.

The present study has offered valuable insights, on adoption of AI in enterprises, there is definitely a scope for additional research. Upcoming studies will reveal add on factors influencing AI adoption, such as leadership, organizational culture, and employee readiness, that might come up with entire understanding of AI implementation. Moreover, expanding the scope of research to other industries, segments and geographical regions could provide knowledge about how contextual factors influence the process of AI adoption.

Additionally, assessing and studying the ethical and social implications of AI integration in decision-making processes would better the discourse on responsible AI adoption and governance. Long-term studies can help to examine the enduring effect of AI adoption on enterprise sustanability and performance. Longitudinal studies can bring major contribution to the research of AI adoption in an enterprise. To conclude, AI continues to grow, and future research will play a critical role in forming its transformative potential across segments. 

1. Agarwal, P., Swami, S., & Malhotra, S. K. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Adoption in the Post COVID-19 New-Normal and Role of Smart Technologies in Transforming Business: a Review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 15(3), 506–529. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-08-2021-0122
2. Ahmad, T. (2020). Scenario based approach to re-imagining future of higher education which prepares students for the future of work. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 10(1), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-12-2018-0136
3. Bag, S., & Pretorius, J. H. C. (2022). Relationships between industry 4.0, sustainable manufacturing and circular economy: proposal of a research framework. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(4), 864–898. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-04-2020-2120
4. Basu, M. (2024). Tech-Driven Horizons: Pioneering Sustainable Tourism for Environmental Resilience and SDGs Triumph. In P. Singh, S. Daga, K. Yadav, & A. Jain (Eds.), The Need for Sustainable Tourism in an Era of Global Climate Change: Pathway to a Greener Future (pp. 215–247). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83608-668-020241032
5. Chan, K. C. (1993). Intelligent Corporate Strategy: Beyond World‐class Manufacturing Manufacturing. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 93(2), 1–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635579310032824
6. Cook, J. S., & Cook, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in management education: transformative potential and challenges. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 89(4), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMAMJ-05-2024-0026
7. Costa, C. M., Martinez-Galán, E., & Leandro, F. J. (2022). Does Fifth Industrial Revolution Benefit or Trouble the Global Civil Society? In R. Oberoi, J. P. Halsall, & M. Snowden (Eds.), Contestations in Global Civil Society (pp. 45–62). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-700-520221006
8. Dahms, H. F. (2021). Social Theory’s Burden: From Heteronomy to Vitacide (or, How Classical Critical Theory Predicted Proliferating Rackets, Authoritarian Personalities, and Administered Worlds in the Twenty-first Century). In H. F. Dahms (Ed.), Society in Flux (Vol. 37, pp. 3–55). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0278-120420210000037001
9. Dawra, S., Pathak, V., & Sharma, S. (2024). Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Green Human Resource Management (GHRM) Practices: A Systemic Review. In S. Gupta, S. Taneja, E. Özen, K. Sood, & S. Grima (Eds.), Green Management: A New Paradigm in the World of Business (pp. 83–96). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83797-442-920241006
10. de Bem Machado, A., de Barros, G. O., dos Santos, J. R., Secinaro, S., Calandra, D., & Sousa, M. J. (2024). AI’s Role in the Development and Transformation of Smart Cities. In M. D. Lytras, A. Alkhaldi, & S. Malik (Eds.), The Emerald Handbook of Smart Cities in the Gulf Region: Innovation, Development, Transformation, and Prosperity for Vision 2040 (pp. 135–169). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83608-292-720241008
11. Fuchs, C. (2022). Policy Discourses on Robots and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the EU, the USA, and China. In Digital Humanism (pp. 155–171). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80382-419-220221006
12. Halagatti, M., Gadag, S., Mahantshetti, S., Hiremath, C. v, Tharkude, D., & Banakar, V. (2023). Artificial Intelligence: The New Tool of Disruption in Educational Performance Assessment. In P. Tyagi, S. Grima, K. Sood, B. Balamurugan, E. Özen, & T. Eleftherios (Eds.), Smart Analytics, Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Performance Management in a Global Digitalised Economy (Vol. 110A, pp. 261–287). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-37592023000110A014
13. Jiang, H., & Jiang, N. (2024). Data and contemporary economics: role, paradox and                    development                    development. China Political Economy, 7(2), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1108/CPE-09-2024-0014
14. Jonathan, H., Magd, H., & Khan, S. A. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and Augmented Reality: A Business Fortune to Sustainability in the Digital Age. In N. Singh, P. Kansra, & S. L. Gupta (Eds.), Navigating the Digital Landscape (pp. 85–105). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83549-272-720241005
15. Lueddeke, G. R. (2020). Universities in the Early Decades of the Third Millennium: Saving the World from Itself? In E. Sengupta, P. Blessinger, & C. Mahoney (Eds.), Civil Society and Social Responsibility in Higher Education: International Perspectives on Curriculum and Teaching Development (Vol. 21, pp. 229–266). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2055-364120200000021016
16. Mattiello, H., Alijani, O., Rahimi Moghaddam, M., & Ameri, B. (2024). Evolving visitors/tourists’ demands, preference and future expectations, related to 7PS sustainability during and after the pandemic through the X.0 wave/tomorrow age theory (when X.0=5.0). Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 16(6), 775–815. https://doi.org/10.1108/WHATT-08-2024-0186
17. Mer, A., & Virdi, A. S. (2023). Navigating the Paradigm Shift in HRM Practices Through the Lens of Artificial Intelligence: A Post-pandemic Perspective. In P. Tyagi, N. Chilamkurti, S. Grima, K. Sood, & B. Balusamy (Eds.), The Adoption and Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Human Resources Management, Part A (pp. 123–154). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80382-027-920231007
18. Morgan, P., & Cogan, N. A. (2024). Using artificial intelligence to address mental health inequalities: co-creating machine learning algorithms with key stakeholders and citizen engagement. Journal of Public Mental Health, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMH-07-2024-0095
19. Mukherjee, A. N. (2022). Application of artificial intelligence: benefits and limitations for human potential and labor-intensive economy –  an empirical investigation into pandemic ridden Indian industry limitations for human potential and labor-intensive economy – an empirical investigation into pandemic ridden Indian industry. Management Matters, 19(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/MANM-02-2022-0034
20. Olaleye, S. A., Mogaji, E., Agbo, F. J., Ukpabi, D., & Gyamerah Adusei, A. (2023). The composition of data economy: a bibliometric approach and TCCM framework of conceptual, intellectual and social structure. Information Discovery and Delivery, 51(2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-02-2022-0014
21. Pilar García-Guadilla, M., & Blauert, J. (1992). Environmental Social Movements in Latin America and Europe: Challenging Development and Democracy. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 12(4/5/6/7), 1–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb060146
22. Rahman, E. Z., Aziz, S., Shah, S. B. A., & Asrifan, A. (2024). The Effect of the Regenerative Tourism Movement on the Global Industry and the Role of Artificial Intelligence. In A. Alnoor, G. E. Bayram, C. XinYing, & S. H. A. Shah (Eds.), The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Regenerative Tourism and Green Destinations (pp. 165–183). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-746-420241011
23. Rajguru, K. (2024). Artificial Intelligence and the Perspective of Value Creation: Present Research Focus and Future Directions. In L. Matosas-López (Ed.), The Impact of Digitalization on Current Marketing Strategies (pp. 163–181). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-686-320241010
24. Roumell, E. A., & Roessger, K. (2019). Humanistic, Innovative Solutionism: What Role do Data Analytics Play in Developing a More Responsive and More Intelligent Adult and Workforce Education Policy? In T. D. Jules & F. D. Salajan (Eds.), The Educational Intelligent Economy: Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning and the Internet of Things in Education (Vol. 38, pp. 127–142). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-367920190000038008
25. Shamsuddoha, M. (2015). Integrated Supply Chain Model for Sustainable Manufacturing: A System Dynamics Approach. In Sustaining Competitive Advantage Via Business Intelligence, Knowledge Management, and System Dynamics (Vol. 22B, pp. 155–399). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1069-09642015000022B003
26. Vishwakarma, L. P., & Singh, R. K. (2023). An Analysis of the Challenges to Human Resource in Implementing Artificial Intelligence. In P. Tyagi, N. Chilamkurti, S. Grima, K. Sood, & B. Balusamy (Eds.), The Adoption and Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Human Resources Management, Part B (pp. 81–109). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80455-662-720230006
27. Wright, D. W. M., & Zascerinska, S. (2023). Becoming immortal: future wellness and medical tourism markets. Journal of Tourism Futures, 9(2), 168–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-05-2021-0119
28. Zu, L. (2023). From Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) to Sustainable Development: The Role of the United Nations. In Responsible Management and Taoism, Volume 2 (pp. 89–133). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83797-639-320231007