The rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has fundamentally reshaped consumer-marketer interactions, influencing how individuals perceive, evaluate, and engage with products and services in digital environments. With advancements in machine learning, natural language processing, and predictive analytics, AI technologies are now central to personalization, automation, and real-time engagement in marketing contexts (Davenport et al., 2020; Jarek & Mazurek, 2019). AI-driven applications such as recommendation engines, virtual assistants, and algorithmically curated social cues are increasingly deployed to enhance the consumer journey, improve targeting precision, and influence purchasing behavior (Pizzi et al., 2021; Grewal et al., 2020). While these tools promise enhanced convenience and personalization, their psychological and behavioral impacts on consumers remain complex and multifaceted. For instance, trust in AI systems, perceived relevance of automated suggestions, and transparency of algorithmic logic have all been shown to significantly affect consumer attitudes and decisions (Paschen et al., 2020; Shankar, 2018; Chatterjee et al., 2021). Despite growing academic interest, empirical studies examining the integrated influence of multiple AI-enabled marketing mechanisms on consumer purchase decisions are limited. This study addresses that gap by exploring how AI-driven product recommendations, interactive virtual assistance, and socially influenced AI cues collectively shape consumer purchase intentions, using a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach grounded in established behavioral theory (Ajzen, 1991; Davis, 1989).

Background and Context

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into marketing strategies has revolutionized the way businesses interact with consumers. AI technologies, such as machine learning algorithms, natural language processing, and predictive analytics, enable marketers to deliver personalized experiences, optimize customer journeys, and enhance decision-making processes (Jarek & Mazurek, 2019). These advancements have led to the emergence of AI-driven tools like chatbots, recommendation systems, and dynamic pricing models, which significantly influence consumer behavior and purchasing decisions (Grewal et al., 2020).​

The proliferation of AI in marketing is evident across various industries. For instance, e-commerce platforms utilize AI to analyze consumer data, predict preferences, and offer tailored product suggestions, thereby increasing conversion rates and customer satisfaction (Chatterjee et al., 2021). Similarly, AI-powered chatbots provide real-time assistance, improving customer service efficiency and engagement (Huang & Rust, 2018). These applications underscore the transformative impact of AI on consumer-brand interactions.​

Problem Statement

Despite the growing adoption of AI in marketing, there remains a gap in understanding its direct impact on consumer behavior. While theoretical frameworks suggest that AI enhances customer experiences and influences purchasing decisions, empirical studies examining these relationships are limited (Davenport et al., 2020). Moreover, the complexity of AI technologies and their multifaceted applications necessitate comprehensive research to elucidate their effects on consumer perceptions, trust, and loyalty.​

Additionally, concerns about data privacy, algorithmic transparency, and ethical considerations pose challenges to the widespread acceptance of AI-driven marketing tools (Paschen et al., 2020). Understanding how these factors influence consumer attitudes and behaviors is crucial for businesses aiming to implement AI technologies effectively and responsibly.​

Research Objectives

• Examine the influence of AI-driven product recommendations on consumer purchase intentions.
• Assess the impact of interactive virtual assistance on consumer engagement and satisfaction.
• Evaluate the role of AI-enabled social proof cues in shaping consumer trust and perceptions.
• Analyze the overall effect of AI-driven marketing tools on consumer purchasing behavior.​

Significance of the Study

This research contributes to the existing literature by providing empirical evidence on the impact of AI-driven marketing tools on consumer behavior. By employing Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the study offers a nuanced understanding of the relationships between AI applications and consumer responses. The findings can inform marketers and business strategists on effectively leveraging AI technologies to enhance customer experiences, build trust, and drive sales.​

The study addresses ethical considerations by exploring consumer concerns related to data privacy and algorithmic transparency, offering insights into responsible AI implementation in marketing practices.

AI-Driven Product Recommendations

AI-driven product recommendation systems have become integral to modern e-commerce platforms, enhancing user experience by providing personalized suggestions based on consumer behavior and preferences. These systems leverage machine learning algorithms to analyze vast datasets, enabling businesses to predict consumer needs effectively. Research indicates that such personalized recommendations significantly influence consumer purchase intentions and satisfaction. For instance, a study by Patil (2024) highlights that AI-driven personalization enhances customer engagement and conversion rates by delivering highly targeted marketing messages that align with individual consumer preferences.​

Moreover, the transparency and trustworthiness of AI recommendations play a crucial role in consumer acceptance. Studies suggest that when consumers perceive AI recommendations as transparent and trustworthy, their purchase intentions are positively affected (Patil, 2024). However, concerns about data privacy and algorithmic bias remain prevalent, necessitating further research into ethical AI deployment in marketing strategies.​

Interactive Virtual Assistance

Interactive virtual assistants, including chatbots and voice-activated systems, have transformed customer service by providing immediate and personalized responses to consumer inquiries. These AI-powered tools enhance customer engagement and satisfaction by offering 24/7 support and reducing response times. Gursoy et al. (2019) found that consumers are increasingly accepting AI devices in service delivery, particularly when these systems demonstrate human-like interactions and effectively resolve customer issues.​

However, the effectiveness of virtual assistants depends on their ability to understand and respond to complex customer needs accurately. Challenges such as misinterpretation of queries and lack of emotional intelligence can hinder consumer trust and satisfaction. Therefore, continuous improvement in natural language processing and emotional recognition capabilities is essential for enhancing the efficacy of interactive virtual assistants in marketing.​

AI-Enabled Social Proof Cues

Social proof, a psychological phenomenon where individuals mimic the actions of others under the assumption that those actions reflect correct behavior, is amplified in digital marketing through AI-enabled cues. AI systems analyze consumer data to highlight trending products, customer reviews, and ratings, thereby influencing purchasing decisions. Pizzi et al. (2021) discuss how AI-curated social proof cues, such as "bestseller" tags and customer testimonials, significantly impact consumer trust and purchase intentions.​

The integration of AI in social media platforms allows for real-time analysis of consumer behavior, enabling marketers to tailor social proof cues effectively. However, the authenticity of AI-generated social proof remains a concern, as consumers may question the credibility of automated endorsements. Ensuring transparency in AI algorithms and maintaining genuine customer feedback are critical for sustaining consumer trust.​

Consumer Purchase Decision in the AI Context

The advent of AI in marketing has redefined the consumer purchase decision-making process. AI tools influence various stages of the consumer journey, from awareness to post-purchase behavior, by providing personalized experiences and reducing information overload. Lemon and Verhoef (2016) emphasize the importance of understanding customer experience throughout the journey, noting that AI can enhance decision-making by offering relevant information and simplifying choices.​

However, the reliance on AI also raises concerns about consumer autonomy and the potential for manipulation. Ensuring that AI systems empower rather than exploit consumers is essential for ethical marketing practices. Further research is needed to explore the balance between personalization and consumer control in AI-driven marketing strategies.​

Research Design

This study adopts a quantitative, cross-sectional research design, aiming to empirically evaluate the direct impact of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven marketing tools on consumer purchase decisions. Given the complexity of interrelated constructs and the need to assess multiple latent variables simultaneously, Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was selected as the primary analytical technique. This method enables the assessment of both the measurement model (construct validity and reliability) and the structural model (hypothesized relationships among constructs), offering a robust approach for theory testing and model evaluation (Hair et al., 2019).

Population and Sample

The target population comprises digital consumers aged 18 and above who have had recent exposure to AI-enabled marketing interfaces such as product recommendations, chatbots, or algorithm-based promotions. The sampling frame includes individuals actively engaged in online retail platforms, particularly in metropolitan Indian cities where AI-driven tools are widely deployed.

A non-probability purposive sampling technique was employed to identify participants familiar with AI features in digital commerce. This approach is appropriate given the need for informed responses. A total of 420 responses were collected through an online structured questionnaire, of which 400 valid responses were retained for final analysis after data screening. This sample size meets the recommended threshold for SEM (i.e., 10 observations per estimated parameter) and ensures statistical power (Kline, 2016).

Instrument Development

The survey instrument was structured into five sections, comprising demographic information and four latent constructs aligned with the study's conceptual framework:

1. AI-Driven Product Recommendations (5 items) – adapted from Tam & Oliveira (2019)
2. Interactive Virtual Assistance (5 items) – adapted from Gursoy et al. (2019)
3. AI-Enabled Social Proof Cues (5 items) – adapted from Pizzi et al. (2021)
4. Consumer Purchase Decision (5 items) – adapted from Lemon & Verhoef (2016)

All items were measured on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). The questionnaire underwent expert validation to ensure content relevance and clarity.

AI-Driven Product Recommendations:

Interactive Virtual Assistance:

AI-Enabled Social Proof Cues:

Consumer Purchase Decision:

Data Collection Procedure

Data were collected using a self-administered online survey hosted on Google Forms. Participants were recruited through social media platforms (LinkedIn, Instagram, and WhatsApp groups) and via targeted outreach through e-commerce forums. Inclusion criteria were clearly stated, and a screening question ensured respondents had interacted with AI-based systems while shopping online.

The data collection process was conducted over a 4-week period, with informed consent obtained from all respondents. Ethical standards regarding voluntary participation, anonymity, and confidentiality were strictly adhered to.

Measurement Model Assessment

• Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s Alpha and Composite Reliability (CR), with thresholds of 0.70 for acceptable reliability (Nunnally & Bernstein, 1994).
• Convergent validity was evaluated through Average Variance Extracted (AVE), with values above 0.50 considered acceptable (Fornell & Larcker, 1981).
• Discriminant validity was tested using the Fornell-Larcker criterion and Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) ratio.

Structural Model Assessment

• Path coefficients, t-values, and p-values were derived through bootstrapping with 5000 subsamples to test the hypotheses.
• R² values were used to assess the explanatory power of the independent variables.

All analyses were conducted using SmartPLS 4.0, a robust tool for partial least squares SEM analysis particularly suited for exploratory models with latent variables.

Hypothesis:

• H1: AI-driven product recommendations have a significant positive effect on consumer purchase decision.
• H2: Interactive virtual assistance has a significant positive effect on consumer purchase decision.
• H3: AI-enabled social proof cues have a significant positive effect on consumer purchase decision.

Ethical Considerations

This study adheres to ethical guidelines for social science research. Participation was voluntary, and respondents were informed about the purpose of the study and their rights to withdraw at any stage. No personally identifiable information was collected, and all responses were anonymized.

Limitations of Methodology

While the study employs a rigorous SEM approach, certain limitations are acknowledged. The use of purposive sampling may limit generalizability. Additionally, the reliance on self-reported measures may be subject to common method bias, though procedural remedies (e.g., anonymity, randomization of questions) were implemented to minimize this effect.

DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION:

Model Fit:

Outer Loadings:

Construct Reliability and Validity:

The construct reliability and validity results confirm that the measurement model employed in this study exhibits excellent psychometric properties. Cronbach’s alpha values for all four latent variables AI-Driven Product Recommendations (0.960), AI-Enabled Social Proof Cues (0.955), Consumer Purchase Decision (0.960), and Interactive Virtual Assistance (0.952) are well above the commonly accepted threshold of 0.70, indicating a high level of internal consistency and scale reliability. Additionally, the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) values for each construct exceed the recommended minimum of 0.50, with values ranging from 0.840 to 0.864. This indicates that a substantial proportion of the variance in the indicators is captured by their respective latent constructs, thereby establishing strong convergent validity. These results, combined with previously confirmed high outer loadings, demonstrate that the measurement model reliably and validly represents the constructs of interest, allowing for robust interpretation of structural relationships in the model.

Discriminant Validity:

Heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT) - List

The HTMT (Heterotrait-Monotrait) ratio analysis confirms that all construct pairs in the model meet the acceptable thresholds for discriminant validity. All HTMT values fall well below the strict threshold of 0.85, with the highest being 0.821 between Interactive Virtual Assistance and Consumer Purchase Decision. This indicates that each construct in the model is empirically distinct and not capturing redundant or overlapping variance with others. The satisfactory HTMT values support the discriminant validity of the measurement model, thereby reinforcing the integrity and theoretical distinctiveness of the latent variables. These results allow for confident interpretation of the structural relationships among the constructs in the SEM framework.

Fornell-Larcker criterion:

The Fornell-Larcker criterion results affirm that discriminant validity is well established among all the constructs in the model. The square root of the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) for each construct shown as the diagonal values in the table—exceeds its correlations with all other latent variables, confirming that each construct shares more variance with its own indicators than with those of any other construct. For example, the square root of AVE for AI-Driven Product Recommendations is 0.929, which is greater than its highest correlation of 0.724 with Interactive Virtual Assistance. Similar patterns are observed for AI-Enabled Social Proof Cues (√AVE = 0.921), Consumer Purchase Decision (√AVE = 0.929), and Interactive Virtual Assistance (√AVE = 0.916), each of which shows lower inter-construct correlations. These results, in combination with the HTMT values previously confirmed, strongly support the presence of discriminant validity, ensuring that all constructs in the measurement model are empirically distinct.

Structural Equation Modeling:

Structural Model Assessment

The path coefficient results from the structural model reveal that all three hypothesized relationships between AI-driven marketing tools and Consumer Purchase Decision are statistically significant (p < 0.001). Each path coefficient has a high t-value, indicating strong support for the hypothesized effects. Among the three predictors, Interactive Virtual Assistance (β = 0.466) shows the strongest influence on consumer purchase decisions, followed by AI-Enabled Social Proof Cues (β = 0.242) and AI-Driven Product Recommendations (β = 0.219). The model's explanatory power is supported by these statistically robust paths, confirming the relevance of AI-enabled tools in shaping modern consumer behavior.

H1: AI-driven product recommendations have a significant positive effect on consumer purchase decision.

The analysis reveals a positive and statistically significant relationship between AI-driven product recommendations and consumer purchase decision (β = 0.219, t = 4.980, p = 0.000). This suggests that personalized recommendations generated by AI systems based on consumer behavior and preferences meaningfully influence purchasing intent. While the effect size is moderate, the high level of statistical significance confirms that AI recommendation systems contribute to improving consumer decision-making by increasing relevance and convenience. Therefore, H1 is supported.

H2: Interactive virtual assistance has a significant positive effect on consumer purchase decision.

Results show that interactive virtual assistance has the strongest positive effect on consumer purchase decision among the constructs tested (β = 0.466, t = 9.206, p = 0.000). This indicates that AI-powered assistants, such as chatbots and voice-based agents, significantly enhance consumers’ purchase intent by providing immediate, personalized, and helpful support. The high path coefficient and t-statistic reinforce the critical role of interactive AI in creating seamless shopping experiences and resolving customer queries efficiently. Therefore, H2 is strongly supported.

H3: AI-enabled social proof cues have a significant positive effect on consumer purchase decision.

The structural model confirms that AI-enabled social proof cues also have a statistically significant positive influence on consumer purchase decision (β = 0.242, t = 5.798, p = 0.000). These cues—such as “bestseller” tags, trending indicators, or highly rated products curated through AI algorithms help build consumer trust and confidence by leveraging perceived popularity and validation from other users. Although the impact is not as strong as virtual assistance, it remains an important predictor of decision-making. Thus, H3 is supported.

R Square:

The R-square value of 0.685 demonstrates that the proposed model explains 68.5% of the variance in consumer purchase decisions, suggesting a strong predictive capability of the independent variables—AI-driven product recommendations, interactive virtual assistance, and AI-enabled social proof cues. The adjusted R-square of 0.684 indicates that the explanatory power remains consistent when controlling for the number of predictors. These values underscore the model's overall strength and validity in capturing the determinants of consumer behavior in AI-mediated digital environments.

This study aimed to explore the influence of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled marketing tools—namely AI-driven product recommendations, interactive virtual assistance, and AI-enabled social proof cues—on consumer purchase decisions in the context of digital commerce. The findings offer empirical support to the growing body of literature that posits AI technologies as pivotal influencers of modern consumer behavior. By employing Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the study evaluated not only the measurement model's psychometric robustness but also the predictive power and causal relationships within the proposed framework.

The results indicate that all three independent variables significantly and positively influence consumer purchase decisions, affirming the hypothesized model. Among them, interactive virtual assistance emerged as the most influential factor (β = 0.466), highlighting the critical role of AI-powered chatbots and digital assistants in providing real-time, personalized support that enhances consumer confidence and facilitates purchase decisions. This finding reflects the increasing consumer preference for immediate and accurate digital interactions that emulate human-like support without the drawbacks of delay or unavailability.

AI-enabled social proof cues also demonstrated a significant impact (β = 0.242), underscoring the importance of algorithmically curated indicators such as "bestsellers", customer ratings, and reviews in shaping consumer trust. These cues act as digital endorsements, leveraging herd behavior to encourage consumer engagement and reduce hesitation during the decision-making process. Meanwhile, AI-driven product recommendations (β = 0.219) positively influenced purchase decisions, confirming that personalized suggestions, informed by browsing and purchase history, contribute meaningfully to enhancing consumer relevance and reducing decision fatigue.

The model’s explanatory strength is evident in the R-square value of 0.685, suggesting that nearly 69% of the variance in consumer purchase decisions can be accounted for by the three AI-enabled constructs. Such a strong R² indicates that these AI-driven mechanisms are not just peripheral enhancements but central to shaping consumer behavior in digital retail environments. The results also meet all psychometric validation criteria: factor loadings were strong and significant; Cronbach’s Alpha and AVE values confirmed internal consistency and convergent validity; and both the Fornell-Larcker criterion and HTMT ratio confirmed discriminant validity among constructs.

From a theoretical standpoint, the study bridges the gap between AI technological capabilities and consumer behavioral outcomes by grounding the model in established frameworks such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). These theories helped explain why consumers engage with AI applications and how such interactions translate into purchasing behaviors.

Practically, the findings offer valuable insights for marketers, digital strategists, and e-commerce platform designers. Businesses should prioritize the deployment of intelligent virtual assistants with advanced natural language capabilities and human-like responsiveness to boost customer satisfaction and purchase intent. Simultaneously, integrating transparent, credible social proof mechanisms and refining recommendation engines can significantly enhance user experience and conversion rates. However, the study also signals the need for ethical vigilance particularly around data transparency, user consent, and algorithmic fairness to ensure that consumer empowerment remains central to AI deployments.

In conclusion, this study substantiates the growing influence of AI in shaping digital consumer behavior, providing empirical evidence that AI-enabled tools are not only efficient but also strategically vital in converting engagement into purchase action. As AI continues to evolve, future research should explore longitudinal effects, cross-cultural variations, and potential mediators such as trust, perceived control, or user experience quality, to deepen our understanding of how AI interfaces reshape consumer-brand dynamics in an increasingly intelligent marketplace.

This study aimed to explore the influence of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled marketing tools—namely AI-driven product recommendations, interactive virtual assistance, and AI-enabled social proof cues—on consumer purchase decisions in the context of digital commerce. The findings offer empirical support to the growing body of literature that posits AI technologies as pivotal influencers of modern consumer behavior. By employing Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), the study evaluated not only the measurement model's psychometric robustness but also the predictive power and causal relationships within the proposed framework.

The results indicate that all three independent variables significantly and positively influence consumer purchase decisions, affirming the hypothesized model. Among them, interactive virtual assistance emerged as the most influential factor (β = 0.466), highlighting the critical role of AI-powered chatbots and digital assistants in providing real-time, personalized support that enhances consumer confidence and facilitates purchase decisions. This finding reflects the increasing consumer preference for immediate and accurate digital interactions that emulate human-like support without the drawbacks of delay or unavailability.

AI-enabled social proof cues also demonstrated a significant impact (β = 0.242), underscoring the importance of algorithmically curated indicators such as "bestsellers", customer ratings, and reviews in shaping consumer trust. These cues act as digital endorsements, leveraging herd behavior to encourage consumer engagement and reduce hesitation during the decision-making process. Meanwhile, AI-driven product recommendations (β = 0.219) positively influenced purchase decisions, confirming that personalized suggestions, informed by browsing and purchase history, contribute meaningfully to enhancing consumer relevance and reducing decision fatigue.

The model’s explanatory strength is evident in the R-square value of 0.685, suggesting that nearly 69% of the variance in consumer purchase decisions can be accounted for by the three AI-enabled constructs. Such a strong R² indicates that these AI-driven mechanisms are not just peripheral enhancements but central to shaping consumer behavior in digital retail environments. The results also meet all psychometric validation criteria: factor loadings were strong and significant; Cronbach’s Alpha and AVE values confirmed internal consistency and convergent validity; and both the Fornell-Larcker criterion and HTMT ratio confirmed discriminant validity among constructs.

From a theoretical standpoint, the study bridges the gap between AI technological capabilities and consumer behavioral outcomes by grounding the model in established frameworks such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). These theories helped explain why consumers engage with AI applications and how such interactions translate into purchasing behaviors.

Practically, the findings offer valuable insights for marketers, digital strategists, and e-commerce platform designers. Businesses should prioritize the deployment of intelligent virtual assistants with advanced natural language capabilities and human-like responsiveness to boost customer satisfaction and purchase intent. Simultaneously, integrating transparent, credible social proof mechanisms and refining recommendation engines can significantly enhance user experience and conversion rates. However, the study also signals the need for ethical vigilance particularly around data transparency, user consent, and algorithmic fairness to ensure that consumer empowerment remains central to AI deployments.

In conclusion, this study substantiates the growing influence of AI in shaping digital consumer behavior, providing empirical evidence that AI-enabled tools are not only efficient but also strategically vital in converting engagement into purchase action. As AI continues to evolve, future research should explore longitudinal effects, cross-cultural variations, and potential mediators such as trust, perceived control, or user experience quality, to deepen our understanding of how AI interfaces reshape consumer-brand dynamics in an increasingly intelligent marketplace.

1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
2. Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Tamilmani, K., & Sharma, A. (2021). The adoption of artificial intelligence in e-commerce: A bibliometric analysis and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 60, 102383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102383
3. Davenport, T. H., Guha, A., Grewal, D., & Bressgott, T. (2020). How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00696-0
4. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
5. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
6. Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A. L., & Nordfält, J. (2020). The future of retailing. Journal of Retailing, 96(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2019.12.001
7. Gursoy, D., Chi, O. H., Lu, L., & Nunkoo, R. (2019). Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.03.008
8. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
9. Jarek, K., & Mazurek, G. (2019). Marketing and artificial intelligence. Central European Business Review, 8(2), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.213
10. Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
11. Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420
12. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
13. Paschen, J., Pitt, C., & Kietzmann, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence: Building blocks and an innovation typology. Business Horizons, 63(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.10.004
14. Patil, D. (2024). Artificial intelligence for personalized marketing and consumer behaviour analysis: Enhancing engagement and conversion rates. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377764205
15. Pizzi, G., Scarpi, D., & Pantano, E. (2021). Artificial intelligence and the new forms of interaction: Who has the control when interacting with a chatbot? Journal of Business Research, 129, 878–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.006
16. Shankar, V. (2018). How artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping retailing. Journal of Retailing, 94(4), vi–xi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2018.10.002
17. Tam, C., & Oliveira, T. (2019). Understanding the impact of m-banking on individual performance: DeLone & McLean and TTF perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.016
18. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
19. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
20. L, A. Agrawal and M. Kothari, "An Analysis of the Decline in Face-to-Face Communication Due to Technology," 2024 5th International Conference on Electronics and Sustainable Communication Systems (ICESC), Coimbatore, India, 2024, pp. 683-687, doi: 10.1109/ICESC60852.2024.10689938.
21. Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155–172.