Evidence based practise represents a radical paradigm shift in healthcare delivery, which predicts the combination of the strongest research evidence with expert judgement of the clinicians and the values of their patients to influence the process of therapeutic decision-making. In a world whereby the knowledge base in medicine is growing exponentially and the therapeutic modalities are rapidly advancing, the disconnect between research and clinical practise has increased to a point which has created such disparity in care delivery and poor patient outcomes. The paramedical staff (nurses, laboratory staff, radiographers, respiratory therapists, and allied health practitioners) constitutes the backbone of the healthcare delivery systems and have central roles in converting scholarly evidence to clinical practise. However, the adoption of evidence-based practises among paramedical staff is still infrequent and is under the influence of a multiplicity of factors, includingthe level of knowledge, technical ability, the resources available, organisational culture, and access to education.

Continuous Medical Education (CME) constitutes the primary channel through which paramedical practitioners obtain and maintain the knowledge and skills necessary in order to employ evidence based clinical practise. CME programmes provide formal educational experiences that react to the developing epistemology, present the new clinical guidelines, develop the capacity to critically appraise, and an ethos of inquiry and continuous betterment. The effectiveness of CME in encouraging evidence-based practise does not only rely on knowledge dissemination but on ability building and competencies that will allow professionals to find, evaluate and synthesise research findings to contextually applicable clinical issues. Further, organisational factors, including access to evidence repositories, organisational support of EBP programmes, and current cultural practises with respect to the use of research, play an important role in moderating the degree to which CME can lead to actual changes in clinical behaviour.

Although the importance of evidence-based practise and the popularity of CME programmes are acknowledged widely, the empirical research that elucidates the exact mechanisms through which CME helps paramedical staff to adopt EBP is still rare. The available literature is mainly focused on physicians or other nursing professionals thus overlooking the diverse range of the paramedical labour force. Cohesive examinations that violate the multidimensional association between CME and evidence-based practise, including areas of knowledge, skill advancement, resource accessibility, organisational culture, and implementation, are significantly scarce, particularly in the developing healthcare settings.

These gaps are filled in the current research, which aims to make an empirical evaluation of the role of the different dimensions of CME-related aspects in the adoption of evidence-based clinical practises by paramedical professionals. This research intends to stimulate the research utilisation in clinical settings by producing strong evidence-based recommendations to design the educational intervention to improve the patient care quality.

In 1996, Sackett et al. defined evidence-based medicine in the following way: The careful, clear, and selective use of up-to-date best evidence in the decision-making process regarding the care of the individual patient. Their seminal work was the foundation of incorporating research findings alongside clinical skills and patient desires, and it has defined the conceptual framework of the modern evidence-based practise in all healthcare fields.

Guyatt and Rennie (2002) also enhanced the principles and praxis of evidence-based medicine by emphasising on critical appraisal competencies in identifying the research validity and contextual relevance of the research to the clinical practise.

A study conducted by Melnyk and colleagues (2004) on the issues of salient impediments to evidence-based practise among healthcare professionals found that the lack of epistemic capabilities, limited critical appraisal skills, time constraints, and institutional support were identified as the shortcomings of the evidence-based practise problem, and the need to elaborate educational change interventions that consider both personal capabilities and institutional factors was noted.

Straus and colleagues (2011) established an elaborate framework on how to teach and implement evidence-based medicine and listed the five procedural steps, which include: defining clinical questions, retrieving relevant evidence, conducting critical evaluation, translating results into clinical judgement, and evaluating outcomes. This theoretical framework has gained extensive usage in the realms of healthcare education and practise.

A systematic review of continuing education interventions undertaken by Forsetlund et al. (2009) revealed that interactive pedagogies with elements that are practise-based are more effective than didactic modalities that are passive in enhancing evidence-based practises behaviour. Their data supports the first principle of active learning strategies in the design of CME.

Melnyk and Fineout -Overholt (2015) investigated organisational culture and willingness to implement evidence-based practise and showed that institutional support, the commitment of leadership, and availability of resources have a significant impact on the EBP behaviour of clinicians. Their results emphasise the need to develop favourable organisational climates to maintain evidence-based practice

Cochrane Collaboration (2013) asserts that systematic reviews and evidence syntheses are invaluable assets in the clinical decisions but many health-care practitioners are deficient in access and capability to mobilise such tools. This two-sided problem of resource shortage and the ability building is still critical in advancing evidence-based practise.

The study by Saunders and Vehvilainen -Julkunen (2016) investigated the pedagogic role of influencing evidence-based practise skills among allied health and nursing practitioners, and the results showed a significant improvement in knowledge and translational application of research evidence into practise with structured EBP curricula integrating didactic instruction, mentorship, and clinical application.

The results of a study by Albarqouni and colleagues (2018) on critical appraisal acumen amongst healthcare practitioners supported the idea that formal research methodology and evidence- assessment training significantly increases the ability of clinicians to evaluate the quality of the studies, interpret the results, and effectively apply the evidence in clinical settings.

Coomarasamy and Khan (2004) evaluated the effectiveness of evidence-based medicine education and proved that learning interventions have the potential to significantly increase knowledge, attitudes and skills in the field of EBM; nonetheless, the transfer of the advantages into long-term change in clinical behaviour is cumbersome unless supported and reinforced.

Tilson and colleagues (2011) developed and tested an instrument of measuring the amount of evidence susceptible behaviour in health-care professionals and discovered the agreement between self-reported EBP behaviours and actual clinical practise depending on the presence of sufficient organisational support and supply of resources hence indicated the relevance of environmental factors in enabling evidence use.

Li and co-authors (2023) examined how continuing professional development affects evidence - based practise adoption among allied health professionals, showing that structured CPD programmes including EBP principles, training on critical appraisal and projects on extending the application of EBP in workplace settings, have significant effects on increasing research utilisation in clinical practise over a long period of time.

Whereas the available literature outlines the importance of evidence-based practise and pinpoints numerous factors that influence its adoption, there is a lack of empirical studies on the exact implications of CME on the polyfaceted aspects of EBP application by paramedical workers. Most studies focus on the discrete components of knowledge or attitudes giving little information on how knowledge, competencies, resources, organisational culture, and practical use have an integrated effect. This research paper attempts to address those gaps by providing systematic empirical data on the overall influence of the factors CME-related to adopt evidence-based clinical practise in the heterogeneous paramedical workforce.

Research Objectives

The primary objective of this study is to empirically examine the influence of Continuous Medical Education on evidence-based clinical practices among paramedical staff. The specific objectives are:

• To assess the impact of knowledge of evidence-based practice principles on adoption of evidence-based clinical practices among paramedical professionals.
• To evaluate the relationship between skills in critically appraising research evidence and evidence-based practice implementation.
• To examine how access to clinical evidence resources affects evidence-based clinical practice adoption.
• To investigate the impact of organizational culture supporting EBP on evidence-based clinical practice behaviors.
• To analyze the relationship between application of research findings in clinical decision-making and overall evidence-based practice adoption.

Research Hypotheses

Based on the research objectives, the following null hypotheses were formulated:

• H₀₁: Knowledge of evidence-based practice principles has no significant impact on adoption of evidence-based clinical practices among paramedical staff.
• H₀₂: Skills in critically appraising research evidence has no significant impact on evidence-based practice implementation.
• H₀₃: Access to clinical evidence resources has no significant impact on evidence-based practice adoption.
• H₀₄: Organizational culture supporting EBP has no significant impact on evidence-based clinical practice behaviors.
• H₀₅: Application of research findings in clinical decision-making has no significant impact on evidence-based practice adoption.

Research Design:

Consecutive medical education (CME) variables were the dependent variables in the present study, and the interrelationships among these variables and the adoption of evidence based clinical practise among paramedical professionals were the dependent variables. The specified methodological strategy enabled organising the collection of numerical data in a systematic way and conducting significant statistical tests to prove the hypotheses and determine causal relationships between independent and dependent constructs.

Population and Sample:

The target market included paramedical practitioners who work in various health care facilities such as hospitals, diagnostic centres and special clinics. To represent a cross-section of the paramedical workforce, a simple random sampling protocol was used to select 200 paramedical staff members (representing a spectrum of disciplines) who comprised nursing, laboratory science, radiology technology, respiratory therapy, physiotherapy, and emergency medical services. The requirements were that one required at least one year of clinical experience and that he or she had attended at least one CME activity in the last twelve months.

Data Collection Instrument:

A well-designed questionnaire was designed, based on a great body of literature reviews, known evidence-based practise (EBP) assessment tools as well as consultation. The tool consisted of two main parts (1) demographic and professional data; (2) assessment of the CME impact on evidence- based practise. The EBP section had questions that rated five key dimensions, which are knowledge of the EBP principles, critical appraisal competence, access to evidence resources, current organisational EBP culture, and the use of research findings. The self-reported behaviours related to research utilisation in clinical decision making operationalised the dependent variable, namely, adoption of evidence-based clinical practise. Each of the items used a five point Likert scale with strongly disagree (1) and strongly agree (5).

Reliability and Validity:

The questionnaire has passed high reliability and validity tests. The content validity was supported through the use of an expert panel, which was made up of healthcare educators, clinical researchers, and experienced paramedical professionals. The face validity was determined by conducting cognitive interviews by the representatives of the target population. Cronbach alpha was used as a measure of internal consistency reliability and all constructs met the traditional value ( 6x=.70). A pilot test of 30 respondents helped to refine the items and provide clarity, completeness, and topicality.

Data analysis and Interpretation

HYPOTHESIS 1 (H₀₁ & H₁₁): Knowledge of Evidence-Based Practice Principles

Table 1.1: Descriptive Statistics - Knowledge of EBP Principles

Table 1.2: Correlation Analysis - Knowledge of EBP Principles

Table 1.3: Simple Linear Regression - Knowledge of EBP Principles

Model Summary

Table 1.4: ANOVA - Knowledge of EBP Principles

Table 1.5: Regression Coefficients - Knowledge of EBP Principles

Interpretation: As a result of the analysis, knowledge of evidence-based practice principles has a significantly positive effect on evidence-based practice adoption among paramedical staff (β = 0.716, t = 14.428, p < .001). The model explains 51.2% of the total variation in evidence-based practice adoption (R² = 0.512). The magnitude of the observed effect size, Cohen's f² = 1.049, indicates that it is very large, which highlights practical significance. The null hypothesis H₀₁ is therefore rejected and the alternative hypothesis H₁₁ is accepted.

HYPOTHESIS 2 (H₀₂ & H₁₂): Skills in Critically Appraising Research Evidence

Table 2.1: Descriptive Statistics - Skills in Critically Appraising Research Evidence

Table 2.2: Correlation Analysis - Skills in Critically Appraising Research Evidence

Table 2.3: Simple Linear Regression - Skills in Critically Appraising Research Evidence

Model Summary

Table 2.4: ANOVA - Skills in Critically Appraising Research Evidence

Table 2.5: Regression Coefficients - Skills in Critically Appraising Research Evidence

Interpretation: There is a significantly positive influence of skills in critically appraising research evidence on evidence-based practice adoption among paramedical staff (β = 0.690, t = 13.412, p < .001). The model explains 47.6% of the variance (R² = 0.476), which is more explained than by most other predictors. The effect size is very large (Cohen's f² = 0.909), which highlights an important and commanding role. Hypothesis H₀₂ is rejected in favour of H₁₂.

HYPOTHESIS 3 (H₀₃ & H₁₃): Access to Clinical Evidence Resources

Table 3.1: Descriptive Statistics - Access to Clinical Evidence Resources

Table 3.2: Correlation Analysis - Access to Clinical Evidence Resources

Table 3.3: Simple Linear Regression - Access to Clinical Evidence Resources

Model Summary

Table 3.4: ANOVA - Access to Clinical Evidence Resources

Table 3.5: Regression Coefficients - Access to Clinical Evidence Resources

Interpretation: The effect of access to clinical evidence resources on evidence-based practice adoption among paramedical staff is shown to have a strong positive effect with a standardized coefficient of β = 0.635, t = 11.570, and p-value less than .001. To this end, the model explains 40.3% of the variance (R² = 0.403). Cohen's f² = 0.675 that is calculated and falls under the large effects threshold is an indicator of a significant effect. H₀₃ is therefore rejected in favour of H₁₃.

HYPOTHESIS 4 (H₀₄ & H₁₄): Organizational Culture Supporting EBP

Table 4.1: Descriptive Statistics - Organizational Culture Supporting EBP

Table 4.2: Correlation Analysis - Organizational Culture Supporting EBP

Table 4.3: Simple Linear Regression - Organizational Culture Supporting EBP

Model Summary

Table 4.4: ANOVA - Organizational Culture Supporting EBP

Table 4.5: Regression Coefficients - Organizational Culture Supporting EBP

Interpretation: The organizational culture supporting EBP has a demonstrable significant positive effect on evidence-based practice adoption among paramedical staff (β = 0.663, t = 12.459, p < .001). This model explains 43.9% of the variance (R² = 0.439). The size of the effect, Cohen's f² = 0.783, has an impressive practical scale. In that regard, hypothesis H₀₄ is rejected in favour of hypothesis H₁₄.

HYPOTHESIS 5 (H₀₅ & H₁₅): Application of Research Findings in Clinical Decision- Making

Table 5.1: Descriptive Statistics - Application of Research Findings

Table 5.2: Correlation Analysis - Application of Research Findings

Table 5.3: Simple Linear Regression - Application of Research Findings

Model Summary

Table 5.4: ANOVA - Application of Research Findings

Table 5.5: Regression Coefficients - Application of Research Findings

Interpretation: The empirical study indicates that application of research findings in clinical decision-making has a significantly positive impact on evidence-based practice adoption among paramedical staff since the beta index (β = 0.740) exhibits a statistically significant value (t = 15.508, p < .001). The regression model explains 54.8% of the variation in the outcome variable (R² = 0.548), the highest among all predictors. The effect size is very large, as Cohen's f² is 1.213, which thus indicates a significant and commanding effect. In turn, the null hypothesis H₀₅ is rejected in favour of the alternative hypothesis H₁₅.

SUMMARY TABLE: All Hypotheses Testing Results Table 6: Comprehensive Hypothesis Testing Summary

The evidence contained in this paper strongly supports using Continuous Medical Education (CME) to improve the implementation of evidence-based clinical practise (EBP) in paramedical practitioners. All of the five dimensions under consideration showed statistically significant relationships with the applied use of EBP, and the strength of these relationships, which is represented by very large effect sizes, demonstrates their substantial importance to clinical practise. These results are congruent with existing theoretical models of evidence-based practise and supplement the academic research with extensive practise-specific empirical information about the paramedical workforce.

The action-oriented nature of EBP is supported by the fact that its identification of translational application of research findings to clinical decision-making is the most predictive. Although learning and acquiring technical skills forms a requisite, it is the actualizing of evidence into therapeutic choices that characterises the ultimate result of interest. This finding underscores the importance of CME programmes going beyond information transfer to instead adopting pedagogical delivery in facilitating practical use such as case-based learning, simulated clinical activities, quality-improvement initiatives, and implementation support in the workplace. The explanatory 54.8 percent of the variance is an indicator that the organisation of the opportunities and expectations of research use in routine practise has the decisive effect on the overall EBP adoption. he heavy influence of a strong conceptual base in EBP principles proves the inescapability of a wholesome theoretical base. There is a significant difference between paramedical practitioners who understand the need of evidence-based practise, internalise the hierarchy of evidence, critically evaluate the limitations of traditional (tradition-based) methods and aptly combine evidence with clinical expertise to show EBP behaviours. On this basis, education on EBP must be formally incorporated into CME curricula, and it should include the development of clinical queries, clarification of the research design, statistical interpretation, as well as the systematic use of evidence hierarchies to patient-care dilemmas.

Critical appraisal skills were found to be a salient determinant, which highlights the level of competence needed to question the quality of the study, to evaluate its validity and reliability, to identify methodological biases, and to evaluate the contextual applicability. As most paramedical professionals have little training in the research methodology when taking their initial course, the CME programmes need to fill these competencies. The independent appraisal skills, developed through structured critical- appraisal training that uses real research articles and well-established evaluative models, repeated practise and positive feedback will reduce reliance on expert judgement.

A culture within organisations that supports EBP has shown a great impact, which proves that personal knowledge and skills are embedded in wider systemic conditions that can facilitate or hinder the evidence translation. Practises in institutes that appreciate research, provide dedicated time to inquiry, reward EBP behaviour, incorporate evidence discussion into clerical rounds, and establish clear expectations about research-informed practise create a supportive atmosphere within institutes to encourage staff to embrace EBP. These notes suggest that in addition to CME planning, the intervention of education should be integrated with the organisational development initiatives that should focus on leadership support, policy frameworks, performance expectations, and development of a research-focused culture.

Even though the influence of access to evidence resources has the least impact of the dimensions, it is crucial. The infrastructure required by evidence-seeking behaviours is created through the availability of electronic databases, systematic reviews, clinical guidelines, point-of-care resource, and library services. However, access is not sufficient without the necessary knowledge and skill to work with such resources effectively- that is why relative impact of this dimension is relatively small as compared to the other ones. CME programmes must then not just focus on delivering resources, but also developing competencies of efficient searching, retrieval and critical appraisal.

The accumulating evidence of huge effect sizes of all dimensions confirm that CME-related components instil statistically as well as practically significant effects on EBP adoption. The 40.3-54.8 percent variance as depicted can indicate that strategic focus on the following aspects can foster real advancement in research utilisation behaviours among paramedical employees. Such data can be used as strong arguments to design holistic CME programmes covering several aspects of EBP instead of reducing the scope to the process of knowledge dissemination.

In sum, the results indicate that the implementation of EBP in paramedical workers is a multifaceted and complicated phenomenon that will require a unified focus on knowledge creation, the acquisition of new skills, the provision of resources, cultural change, and the efficient application of the practise. There is no dominant dimension; this is because the multiplicity of meaningful relationships highlights the need to have holistic solutions that cut across the entire range of enabling factors. This systems perspective is consistent with the modern concept of knowledge translation and implementation science that puts forward the idea of multi-level interventions that involve the individual, organisational, and systemic actors.

Recommendations

The research outlines some strategies applicable by healthcare facilities, CME organisers, and policy makers focusing on increasing the number of evidence-based clinical practises among paramedical staffs. The most significant of them is the integration of programmed EBP curriculums that constitute the basics, levels of evidence, application of the PICO model to frame clinical questions, effective evidence retrieval, critical appraisal and integration of evidence with clinical acumen and patient preferences. Pedagogic content of this kind must not just be limited to didactic lectures, but should include interactive workshop, practicum, of a hands-on nature with the real research material used, case-based discussion, and application projects in the workplace.

Critical appraisal skills require a systematic approach to teaching using validated frameworks and instruments. CME exercises ought to lead the participants in the process of reviewing the study design, the measure of internal and external validity, identification of possible biases, interpretation of statistical results and identification of clinical relevance and applicability. The provision of templates, checklists, and organised evaluation forms supplements the development of skills and supports the further independent use in clinical practise.

Medical facilities should ensure that the paramedical employees have sufficient access to clinical evidence sources, such as electronic databases (e.g., PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library), systematic review archives, collections of guidelines, point-of-care evidence summaries, and internal library services. No less important is the training of the efficient search strategies, database navigation, and efficient use of these resources to minimise the time barriers and increase the evidence-seeking behaviours.

The transformation of the organisational culture demands a long-term commitment at the top, development of policy, and a strong process of change-management. Administrators are supposed to overtly appreciate and appreciate EBP behaviours by way of performance appraisal, recognition schemes and career development avenues. The safeguarded time to retrieve evidence, initiation of journal clubs and evidence rounds, appointment of EBP champions or mentors, and inclusion of research discussion into the daily clinical experience all play a role in cultivating a culture supporting the use of evidence.

Most importantly, the programmes of CME should provide organised ways through which research can be translated into clinical decision-making. This could include evidence-based quality- improvement initiatives, evidence-based clinical pathway-implementation initiatives, evidence- based guideline implementation initiatives, practise audits compared to evidence-based approaches, and presentations of cases demonstrating evidence-based clinical reasoning. Mentorship, peer support, and feedback systems can support the challenging process of knowledge acquisition to action.

The professional credentialing and regulatory agencies ought to seek to institute the evidence- based practise competencies in the continuous education demands that they put in place, whereby the CME activities are systemic in their approach to not just the dissemination of the EBP

knowledge but also the attainment of the skills, instead of focusing on clinical content updates alone. The requirement to include the elements of EBP in the portfolios of CME might catalyse a more methodical approach to applying the principles of research utilisation in a wide range of educational settings.

Future studies ought to include longitudinal designs to address the long-term effects of CME on the EBP behaviours. Best practises would be enlightened by comparing effectiveness studies that compare disparate educational methods, implementation strategies and organisational intervention. Inclusion of qualitative insights in the mixed-method research may enhance knowledge on the facilitators and obstacles to research utilisation. Research studies that measure the downstream impact of improved EBP adoption on patient outcomes would be more convincing in supporting investment in these educational and organisational efforts.

This empirical study provides the strong evidence that continuous medical education (CME) has a strong, positive impact on the application of evidence-based clinical practise (EBP) among paramedical professionals in a multivariate spectrum of dimensions. The findings prove that knowledge of the principles of EBP, skills to critically analyse the research evidence, access to the resources of clinical evidence, an organisational culture that supports EBP, and the overall practical implementation of the research findings in clinical decision-making produce a significant impact of evidence-based practises. Remarkably, the skill to translate research results was also the most powerful predictor, which denotes the necessity of successful CME programmes to go beyond knowledge-based learning and help to truly transform evidence into clinical practise.

The research proves that implementation of the evidence-based practise is a multidimensional process which demands combined interventions that consider personal abilities, organisational framework, and cultural values. Although knowledge and skills are the necessary prerequisites, just distribution of resources, conducive organisational conditions, and authentic chances to practise the learned information are as necessary in the translation of research evidence into high- quality clinical practises. The large effect sizes found in all dimensions support the high practical importance of the systematic consideration of those in the promotion of evidence-based healthcare provision.

To healthcare institutions that are determined to improve the quality of care and patient safety using evidence based practise, the investment on comprehensive CME programmes that cut across the entire spectrum of facilitating factors is of paramount strategic importance. The interventions provided in education should be beyond passive relay of information to develop critical appraisal skills, accessibility of resources, positive organisational cultures, and organised channels to research utilisation in clinical decision-making. The information given below can be used by CME planners, administrators, and policymakers to design and implement educational and organisational initiatives that will be effective in promoting evidence-based clinical practise among paramedical workforce.

Since the field of healthcare is constantly changing with the increasing level of research knowledge and changing clinical guidelines, the ability of paramedical professionals to access, scrutinise and employ research evidence consistently will become a more prominent part in providing high- quality, safe, and effective patient care. Strengthening that nexus in which CME influences evidence-based practise such as knowledge, skills, resources, culture, and application, healthcare systems can successfully close the research-practise divide, and achieve the promise of evidence- based healthcare to support better patient outcomes and population health.

1. Albarqouni, L., Hoffmann, T., Straus, S., Olsen, N. R., Young, T., Ilic, D., Shaneyfelt, T., Haynes, R. B., Guyatt, G., & Glasziou, P. (2018). Core competencies in evidence-based practice for health professionals: Consensus statement based on a systematic review and Delphi JAMA     Network Open,     1(2), e180281. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0281
2. Cochrane Collaboration. (2013). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley-Blackwell.
3. Coomarasamy, A., & Khan, K. S. (2004). What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. British Medical Journal, 329(7473), 1017. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7473.1017
4. Forsetlund, L., Bjørndal, A., Rashidian, A., Jamtvedt, G., O'Brien, M. A., Wolf, F., Davis, D., Odgaard-Jensen, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2009). Continuing education meetings and workshops: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,          2009(2), https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003030.pub2
5. Guyatt, G., & Rennie, D. (2002). Users' guides to the medical literature: A manual for evidence-based clinical practice. American Medical Association Press.
6. Li, S., Cao, M., & Zhu, X. (2023). Continuing professional development and evidence- based practice among allied health professionals: A longitudinal study. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04142-8
7. Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (3rd ed.). Wolters Kluwer Health.
8. Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Stone, P., & Ackerman, M. (2004). Evidence-based practice: The past, the present, and recommendations for the millennium. Pediatric Nursing, 26(1), 77-80.
9. Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 312(7023), 71-72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71
10. Saunders, H., & Vehviläinen-Julkunen, K. (2016). The state of readiness for evidence- based practice among nurses: An integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 56, 128-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.10.018
11. Straus, S. E., Glasziou, P., Richardson, W. S., & Haynes, R. B. (2011). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (4th ed.). Churchill Livingstone Elsevier.
12. Tilson, J. K., Kaplan, S. L., Harris, J. L., Hutchinson, A., Ilic, D., Niederman, R., Potomkova, J., & Zwolsman, S. E. (2011). Sicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment tools. BMC Medical Education, 11, 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-11-78